TOPIC 2 OF 29

Making of the Indian Constitution — Constituent Assembly

🎓 Class 11 Social Science CBSE Theory Ch 1 — Constitution: Why and How? ⏱ ~25 min
🌐 Language: [gtranslate]

This MCQ module is based on: Making of the Indian Constitution — Constituent Assembly

This assessment will be based on: Making of the Indian Constitution — Constituent Assembly

Upload images, PDFs, or Word documents to include their content in assessment generation.

Class 11 · Political Science · Indian Constitution at Work

Chapter 1 · Constitution: Why and How? — Part 2: How India Made Its Constitution

India’s Constitution did not appear from thin air on 26 January 1950. Behind it lay decades of struggle, four years of debate, eight major committees, hundreds of meetings, and a Constituent Assembly that met for two years, eleven months and eighteen days. This part traces that journey — from the Government of India Act 1935 to the dawn of the Republic.

2.0 The Question Before Us

In Part 1 we asked: what does a constitution do? Now we ask: how was the Indian Constitution actually made? A constitution is only as effective as the process that creates it. The most successful constitutions in history — in India, South Africa and the United States — were drafted in the wake of mass national movements that drew leaders of immense public standing. The Indian Constitution drew its legitimacy from the same source: the long, plural, democratic nationalist movement? that gave it both vision and authority.

2.1 The Constituent Assembly — Origin and Composition

Formally, the Constituent Assembly? was the body that drafted the Indian Constitution. It was first elected for an undivided India. Its first sitting was held on 9 December 1946. After Partition, it reassembled as the Constituent Assembly for divided India on 14 August 1947.

2.1.1 The Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946

The Constituent Assembly was created on the lines suggested by the Cabinet Mission Plan? — a plan put forward by a committee of the British cabinet that came to India in 1946. According to this plan:

  • Each Province and each Princely State (or group of States) was allotted seats roughly in the ratio of 1 seat per 10 lakh (one million) people.
  • Provinces (under direct British rule) were to elect 292 members; Princely States were allotted a minimum of 93 seats.
  • Within each Province, seats were divided among the three main communities — Muslims, Sikhs and the General category — in proportion to their populations.
  • Members of each community in the Provincial Legislative Assemblies elected their own representatives by proportional representation? with single transferable vote.
  • Representatives of the Princely States were chosen by consultation, not by direct election.

So while the Assembly was not elected by universal adult suffrage, real care was taken to make it representative of the various religions, regions and political streams of undivided India.

2.1.2 Composition of the Assembly — Before and After Partition

Under the plan of 3 June 1947 (the Partition plan), members elected from territories that fell under Pakistan ceased to be members of the Constituent Assembly. The number of members was reduced from 389 to 299. The Constitution was eventually adopted on 26 November 1949; 284 members were physically present on 24 January 1950 to sign the Constitution as finally passed. The Constitution came into force on 26 January 1950.

\26A1 Drafting Against the Backdrop of Partition
The Constitution was framed under the shadow of the horrendous violence unleashed by Partition. It is a tribute to the framers’ fortitude that they not only completed a remarkable document under immense pressure, but also drew the right lessons from the violence: the Constitution is built around a new conception of citizenship in which religious identity has no bearing on a person’s rights as a citizen.
Composition of the Constituent Assembly after Partition Total: 299 Members Congress members~82% of seats post-Partition Other parties & independentsAll shades of opinion Scheduled Caste members28 representatives included Note: All major religions represented. Originally 389 members; 299 after Partition (3 June 1947).
Indicative composition of the Constituent Assembly after Partition. Source: NCERT, paraphrased.

Within this 299-member Assembly, every major religion of India had representation. In addition, there were twenty-eight members from the Scheduled Castes. In terms of political parties, the Indian National Congress dominated — occupying about 82 per cent of seats after Partition. But the Congress itself was such a diverse umbrella party that it could accommodate almost every shade of political opinion of the time.

2.2 The Drafting Committee and Its Members

The Assembly worked through a network of eight major committees on different subjects. The most famous of these was the Drafting Committee, which actually wrote the text of the Constitution. It was chaired by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar. The Drafting Committee had seven members in all.

The Drafting Committee — Org Chart DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR Chairman, Drafting Committee Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer Eminent jurist N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar J&K specialist K. M. Munshi Lawyer, scholar Mohammed Saadulla Former Assam CM B. L. Mitter / N. Madhava Rau Replacement D. P. Khaitan / T. T. Krishnamachari Replacement Drafting Committee — 7 members in all, including the Chairman
The seven-member Drafting Committee, chaired by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar. Some original members were replaced during the work.
\1F465 The Seven Members of the Drafting Committee
  1. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar — Chairman
  2. Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer — eminent jurist from Madras
  3. N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar — former Diwan of Jammu & Kashmir
  4. K. M. Munshi — lawyer, scholar and writer
  5. Mohammed Saadulla — former Premier of Assam
  6. B. L. Mitter (later replaced by N. Madhava Rau) — legal expert
  7. D. P. Khaitan (after his death replaced by T. T. Krishnamachari) — lawyer, businessman

2.2.1 Other Key Figures

The President of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Rajendra Prasad, who guided the Assembly through its long deliberations. The eight major committees of the Assembly were typically chaired by Jawaharlal Nehru, Rajendra Prasad, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel or B. R. Ambedkar. These were not men who agreed on many things — Ambedkar had been a sharp critic of the Congress and Gandhi for not doing enough for the upliftment of Scheduled Castes; Patel and Nehru disagreed on many issues. And yet they all worked together.

\1F4DC Dr. Rajendra Prasad on Dr. Ambedkar — CAD, 26 November 1949
We could never have made a decision so right as when we put Dr. Ambedkar on the Drafting Committee and made him its Chairman. Despite his indifferent health, he has worked with extraordinary zeal and devotion. He has not only justified his selection but added lustre to the work of the Committee.
— Dr. Rajendra Prasad, CAD, Vol. XI, p.994 (paraphrased)

2.3 The Procedure of the Constituent Assembly

Each Committee usually drafted particular provisions of the Constitution, which were then debated by the entire Assembly. The standard practice was to seek consensus — on the belief that provisions agreed to by everyone would not damage any group’s interests. Some provisions were eventually put to a vote. But every argument, query and concern was responded to with great care and in writing.

The Assembly met for 166 days, spread over two years and eleven months (specifically, 2 years, 11 months and 18 days). Its sessions were open to the press and the public alike. The voluminous debates that resulted — the Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD) — remain one of the great records of public reasoning in modern political history.

\1F4D0 The Principle of Public Reason
Members of the Constituent Assembly placed great emphasis on discussion and reasoned argument. They did not simply assert their own interests; they gave principled reasons to others to convince them. This practice of giving reasons forces a member to move beyond narrow self-interest. The voluminous CAD volumes are described in NCERT as a tribute to public reason at its best — equal in importance to the records of the French and American Revolutions.

2.3.1 What Was Debated — and What Was Not

Almost every issue at the foundation of a modern state was discussed with great sophistication: should India be centralised or decentralised? What should be the relationship between the States and the Centre? What should be the powers of the judiciary? Should the Constitution protect property rights?

Only one provision of the Constitution was passed without virtually any debate: the introduction of universal adult suffrage? — the rule that every citizen above a certain age would have the right to vote, regardless of religion, caste, education, gender or income. The members felt no need to discuss this question at all. As NCERT remarks: nothing can be a better testament to the democratic commitment of the Assembly.

SOURCE STUDY — Ambedkar on Social Democracy (25 Nov 1949)
Bloom: L4 Analyse
\1F4DC Speech to the Constituent Assembly
Political democracy cannot last unless there lies at the base of it social democracy. Social democracy means a way of life that recognises liberty, equality and fraternity as the principles of life. These three are not separate items; they form a union. Without equality, liberty would produce the supremacy of the few over the many. Equality without liberty would kill individual initiative. Without fraternity, liberty and equality would not become a natural course of things.
— Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, CAD, Vol. XI, p.979 (paraphrased)

Questions:

  1. According to Ambedkar, why is political democracy not enough on its own?
  2. Why does he argue that liberty, equality and fraternity must be treated as a “union” rather than separate items?
  3. Are the three principles being practised in your classroom? Discuss with three friends.
\2705 Sample Pointers
(1) Without social democracy, vote-based equality is hollow — deeply unequal economic and caste structures would defeat its purpose. (2) Liberty alone produces the dominance of the powerful; equality without liberty kills initiative; fraternity is needed to make both natural. (3) Look for examples like equal seating, equal speaking time, mutual respect across backgrounds — these everyday practices are the building blocks of social democracy.

2.4 Inheritance of the Nationalist Movement

No constitution is simply the product of the Assembly that produces it. An Assembly as diverse as India’s could not have functioned without a background consensus on the main principles. That consensus was forged not in 1946 but in the long decades of struggle that preceded it. For decades before 1946, the nationalist movement had debated:

  • The shape and form of government India should have.
  • The values it should uphold — equality, liberty, secularism, justice.
  • The inequalities it should overcome — caste, gender, region, religion.

The answers forged in those long debates were given their final form in the Constitution. The Constituent Assembly was, in a sense, giving institutional shape to principles it had inherited from the freedom struggle.

2.4.1 Key Milestones in the Nationalist Movement

1928
Nehru Report (Motilal Nehru Committee)
An all-parties committee chaired by Motilal Nehru drafted what is often called India’s first attempt at a constitution. It demanded dominion status, a Bill of Rights and adult suffrage.
1931
Karachi Resolution of the Indian National Congress
The Congress passed a resolution on Fundamental Rights and the Economic Programme. It listed civil rights, equality before law, free elementary education and a living wage. These ideas later flowed into the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
1935
Government of India Act
A massive British statute that established Provincial Legislative Assemblies on an extended franchise and a federal scheme. The framers later borrowed many administrative provisions and the membership method of the Constituent Assembly itself from the elected Provincial Assemblies created under this Act.
1946 (Mar–May)
Cabinet Mission to India
Three British cabinet ministers came to India and proposed the framework for a Constituent Assembly. Their plan became the basis on which the Assembly was elected.
9 December 1946
First Sitting of the Constituent Assembly
The Assembly met for the first time with Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha as temporary chairman; Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected its permanent President soon after.
13 December 1946
Objectives Resolution moved by Nehru
Jawaharlal Nehru moved the famous Objectives Resolution, which set out the goals and aspirations of the new India. It was adopted on 22 January 1947 and became the soul of the Preamble.
14 August 1947
Constituent Assembly for divided India
After Partition, the Assembly was reconstituted with 299 members for divided India.
26 November 1949
Constitution Adopted
The Constituent Assembly formally adopted the Constitution — today celebrated as Constitution Day.
26 January 1950
Constitution Comes into Force
The Constitution came into operation; India became a Republic. The day was chosen because it was the anniversary of the Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) declaration of 1930. Today celebrated as Republic Day.

2.5 The Objectives Resolution — The Soul of the Constitution

Perhaps the best summary of the principles the nationalist movement brought to the Constituent Assembly is the Objectives Resolution?, moved by Jawaharlal Nehru on 13 December 1946. This resolution defined the aims of the Assembly. Its key principles — equality, liberty, democracy, sovereignty and a cosmopolitan, civic identity — ran like a thread through the entire Constitution. Most of these ideas were later embedded almost word-for-word in the Preamble.

\1F4DC Main Points of the Objectives Resolution (Paraphrased)
  1. India shall be an independent, sovereign republic.
  2. India shall be a Union of erstwhile British Indian territories, the Indian States, and other parts outside both that are willing to join.
  3. The territories of the Union shall be autonomous units exercising all powers and functions of government, except those vested in the Union.
  4. All powers and authority of the sovereign and independent Indian Republic shall flow from the people.
  5. All people of India shall be guaranteed social, economic and political justice; equality of status and opportunity, equality before law; and fundamental freedoms of speech, expression, belief, faith, worship, vocation, association and action — subject to law and public morality.
  6. Adequate safeguards shall be provided for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and depressed and other backward classes.
  7. The territorial integrity of the Republic and its sovereign rights on land, sea and air shall be maintained according to justice and the law of civilised nations.
  8. India shall make its full and willing contribution to the promotion of world peace and the welfare of mankind.

Through the Objectives Resolution, the Constitution gave institutional form to five fundamental commitments inherited from the freedom struggle: equality, liberty, democracy, sovereignty and a cosmopolitan identity. The Constitution was therefore not merely a maze of rules and procedures, but a moral commitment to fulfil the promises the nationalist movement had held before the people.

EXPLORE — Objectives Resolution to Preamble
Bloom: L4 Analyse

Look up the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. Match each phrase in the Preamble with a corresponding point from the Objectives Resolution above:

  1. “SOVEREIGN... REPUBLIC”
  2. “JUSTICE, social, economic and political”
  3. “LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship”
  4. “EQUALITY of status and of opportunity”
  5. “to promote among them all FRATERNITY”
\2705 Mapping
Phrase 1 maps to Point 1 of the Resolution; Phrase 2 to Point 5 (justice limb); Phrase 3 to Point 5 (freedoms limb); Phrase 4 also to Point 5 (equality limb); Phrase 5 to Point 6 (safeguards) and the broader nationalist vision of unity. Notice how the 1946 Resolution reads almost like an earlier draft of the Preamble itself.

2.6 Borrowings from Other Constitutions

The framers were not insular. They learnt from experiments and experiences of other countries. Each provision was, however, defended on grounds of suitability to Indian problems and aspirations — not merely because some other country had it. As Dr. Ambedkar himself remarked in the Assembly on 4 November 1948, the only new things in a Constitution framed so late in the day are the variations made to remove faults and to suit it to the needs of the country.

Major borrowings — carefully adapted, not copied
Source ConstitutionWhat India Adapted
British ConstitutionParliamentary form of government; First-Past-The-Post electoral system; the rule of law; the Speaker and his/her role; ordinary law-making procedure.
United States ConstitutionCharter of Fundamental Rights; the power of judicial review; the independence of the judiciary.
Irish ConstitutionDirective Principles of State Policy.
French ConstitutionThe principles of liberty, equality and fraternity (drawn ultimately from the French Revolution of 1789).
Canadian ConstitutionA quasi-federal form of government — a federal system with a strong central government; the idea of Residual Powers.
\1F4D6 Borrowing Is Not Imitation
NCERT puts it sharply: borrowing was not slavish imitation. India was lucky to have an Assembly that, instead of being parochial, could take the best available everywhere and make it their own.

2.7 Putting It Together — What Made the Indian Constitution Effective

Recall the three tests of an effective constitution from Part 1: a credible mode of promulgation, sound substantive provisions, and balanced institutional design. The Indian Constitution passes all three.

\1F4DC
Credible promulgation
Drafted by leaders who had earned public trust through decades of struggle — Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Prasad, Rajaji, Maulana Azad, and many others.
\2696
Substantive justice
Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, universal suffrage and reservations gave every section a reason to stand by the Constitution.
\1F3DB
Institutional balance
Power was deliberately fragmented across Legislature, Executive, Judiciary and statutory bodies so that no single institution could subvert the document.
\1F30D
Adaptable design
The right balance between rigidity (some provisions need a constitutional amendment) and flexibility (other parts can change with simpler majorities).
\1F4CB

Competency-Based Questions — Part 2

Case Study: A school is staging a play on the making of the Constitution. The script claims that “the Constituent Assembly was elected by all citizens of India by universal vote in 1946 and adopted the Constitution within six months.” The history teacher asks the student writers to fact-check the script before performance.
Q1. Which of the following is the correct sequence of dates relating to the Indian Constitution?
L1 Remember
  • (A) First sitting 9 Dec 1946 → Adopted 26 Nov 1949 → Came into force 26 Jan 1950
  • (B) First sitting 26 Jan 1946 → Adopted 9 Dec 1949 → Came into force 26 Nov 1950
  • (C) First sitting 14 Aug 1947 → Adopted 26 Jan 1949 → Came into force 26 Nov 1950
  • (D) First sitting 13 Dec 1946 → Adopted 22 Jan 1947 → Came into force 15 Aug 1950
Answer: (A) — The Constituent Assembly first met on 9 December 1946. The Constitution was adopted on 26 November 1949 and came into force on 26 January 1950.
Q2. The play’s claim that “the Assembly was elected by all citizens by universal vote” is incorrect. What is the actual procedure?
L3 Apply
  • (A) Members were nominated by the British Crown
  • (B) Members were elected indirectly by the Provincial Legislative Assemblies, themselves elected on a limited franchise under the Government of India Act, 1935
  • (C) Members were chosen by Mahatma Gandhi
  • (D) Members were chosen by referendum of all adults in India
Answer: (B) — The Cabinet Mission Plan provided for indirect election by the Provincial Assemblies, with seats divided among Muslims, Sikhs and General by proportional representation with single transferable vote.
Q3. In about 60 words, explain the significance of the Objectives Resolution moved by Nehru on 13 December 1946.
L5 Evaluate
Model Answer: The Objectives Resolution defined the aims of the Constituent Assembly. It declared India a sovereign, independent republic where all power flowed from the people, and where social, economic and political justice, equality and fundamental freedoms would be guaranteed. Nearly all its commitments were carried into the Preamble. It was the moral compass of the Constitution — ensuring that the document was not just a maze of rules but a promise of a just society.
HOT Q. Suppose Partition had not happened. Argue, in 80 words, how the Constitution might have looked different. Identify three specific provisions you think would have changed.
L6 Create
Hint: Possible answers — (1) Stronger provisions on minority safeguards (since the Muslim-majority provinces would still be represented). (2) A weaker, more federal centre, since princely state integration pressures would have been different. (3) Possibly different language provisions reflecting greater linguistic diversity. The Assembly would have had its full 389 members and a longer process of consensus-building.
\2696 Assertion–Reason Questions — Part 2
Options:
(A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
(B) Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.
(C) A is true, but R is false.
(D) A is false, but R is true.
Assertion (A): Although the Constituent Assembly was not elected by universal adult suffrage, it had wide legitimacy.
Reason (R): Members were drawn from all major religions and political streams, the Congress accommodated diverse opinion, and the Assembly was led by leaders who commanded immense public credibility.
Answer: (A) — Both true. The reason precisely explains why the Assembly, despite indirect election, drew strong public allegiance.
Assertion (A): The Indian Constitution borrowed extensively from other constitutions.
Reason (R): Borrowing made the Indian Constitution a pale imitation of foreign constitutions.
Answer: (C) — A is true (the framers studied many constitutions), but R is false. Each borrowing was tested for its fit with Indian problems and aspirations and adapted accordingly. NCERT explicitly says borrowing was not slavish imitation.
Assertion (A): The Drafting Committee was chaired by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
Reason (R): Dr. Ambedkar was the President of the Constituent Assembly.
Answer: (C) — A is true: Dr. Ambedkar chaired the seven-member Drafting Committee. R is false: the President of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Rajendra Prasad. Ambedkar was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, a different position.
AI Tutor
Class 11 Political Science — Indian Constitution at Work
Ready
Hi! 👋 I'm Gaura, your AI Tutor for Making of the Indian Constitution — Constituent Assembly. Take your time studying the lesson — whenever you have a doubt, just ask me! I'm here to help.