This MCQ module is based on: Evidence Evolution
Evidence Evolution
This assessment will be based on: Evidence Evolution
Upload images, PDFs, or Word documents to include their content in assessment generation.
Evidence Evolution
7.6 Evidences for Evolution
That evolution of life forms has taken place on earth is supported by evidence from many independent lines of investigation. We examine the five major categories below — paleontological, embryological, anatomical, molecular and biogeographical evidence — each of which converges on the same conclusion: living organisms share common ancestry and have diversified gradually over deep time.
7.6.1 Paleontological Evidence (Fossils)
Fossils are the remains of hard parts of life-forms preserved in sedimentary rocks. Rocks form sediments layer by layer; a vertical cross-section of the earth's crust shows older sediments at the bottom and younger ones above. Different-aged rock layers contain different fossils, indicating that life forms have changed over geological time.
Some fossils resemble organisms that exist today; others represent extinct groups such as dinosaurs and trilobites. Study of fossils in different sedimentary layers tells us the geological period in which each form lived. The ages of fossils are estimated using radioactive dating — measuring the decay of radioisotopes in rock layers.
7.6.2 Embryological Evidence
Ernst Haeckel proposed that the embryos of all vertebrates show certain features in common during their early development that are absent in adults. For example, embryos of all vertebrates — including humans — develop a row of vestigial gill slits just behind the head, although these are functional only in adult fishes.
Haeckel's strong claim — "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" — was later corrected by Karl Ernst von Baer, who showed that embryos never pass through the adult stages of other animals; they pass through early embryonic forms common to the group. Even in its corrected form, embryological similarity remains good evidence for shared ancestry.
7.6.3 Anatomical Evidence: Homology & Analogy
Comparative anatomy reveals two contrasting patterns: homologous structures (similar internal anatomy, different function) and analogous structures (similar function, different internal anatomy). They point to two different evolutionary processes.
Homologous Organs (Divergent Evolution)
Homologous organs share the same basic structural plan inherited from a common ancestor but have been modified for different functions. The classic example is the forelimbs of mammals:
- Whale flipper — swimming
- Bat wing — flying
- Cheetah forelimb — running
- Human arm — grasping
All four contain the same bones in the same arrangement: humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals, phalanges. The same structure has developed in different directions due to adaptation — this is divergent evolution. Other examples: vertebrate hearts and brains.
In plants, the thorn of Bougainvillea and the tendril of Cucurbita are homologous — both are modifications of the stem at the same nodal position but serve different functions (protection vs. climbing).
Analogous Organs (Convergent Evolution)
Analogous organs perform similar functions and may look alike, but have different internal anatomy. They evolved independently in response to similar environmental selection pressures — this is convergent evolution. Examples:
- Wings of butterfly and bird — both fly, but butterfly wings are membranous folds, bird wings are modified forelimbs.
- Eye of octopus and mammal — both image-forming, but built differently in detail.
- Flippers of penguin and dolphin — both for aquatic propulsion; penguin's is a modified wing, dolphin's is a modified forelimb.
- Sweet potato (root) and potato (stem) — both are food-storing underground organs, but one is a root and the other is a stem.
7.6.4 Molecular Evidence
The most powerful modern evidence comes from biochemical and molecular similarity. Genes and proteins performing the same function across diverse organisms are remarkably similar in sequence — pointing to shared ancestry. For example, the cytochrome c protein involved in cellular respiration differs by only 1 amino acid between humans and chimpanzees, but by 13 amino acids between humans and dogs. The greater the similarity, the more recent the common ancestor.
7.6.5 Evidence from Artificial Selection
Humans have bred plants and animals for agriculture, sport and ornament for millennia — creating dramatically different breeds of dogs, cattle, pigeons and crops within just a few centuries. If humans can produce such diversity in a few hundred years, nature has had millions of years to do the same. Artificial selection is therefore a powerful analogue for natural selection.
7.6.6 Industrial Melanism (Peppered Moth)
In England before industrialisation (1850s), most moths in Biston betularia collections were white-winged. After industrialisation (1920), in the same areas, most were dark-winged (melanised). The proportions had reversed.
- Before industrialisation, tree trunks were covered with pale lichen. White moths blended in and survived; dark moths were spotted and eaten by predators.
- After industrialisation, soot killed the lichen and blackened tree trunks. Now dark moths were camouflaged and survived; white moths stood out and were eaten.
- Both moth varieties existed all along — only the selection pressure changed. No variant was completely wiped out.
7.7 Biogeographical Evidence: Darwin's Finches
During his voyage on HMS Beagle, Charles Darwin visited the Galapagos Islands and observed an amazing diversity of small black birds — later called Darwin's finches. All varieties on the islands had evolved from a single seed-eating ancestor that arrived from the South American mainland.
From the original seed-eating form, descendants with altered beaks arose, enabling them to exploit different food sources: insect-eating, vegetarian, cactus-eating. This is the classic example of adaptive radiation — the evolution of multiple species from a common ancestor adapted to different ecological niches in a geographical area.
Australian marsupials are another example: many different marsupials (kangaroo, koala, Tasmanian wolf) evolved from a single ancestral stock within the isolated Australian continent. When more than one adaptive radiation occurs in different geographical areas to produce similar-looking organisms (e.g., placental wolf in North America and marsupial Tasmanian wolf in Australia), this is also called convergent evolution.
7.8 Summary of Evolutionary Evidence
| Evidence Type | Key Example | Process Indicated |
|---|---|---|
| Paleontological (fossils) | Dinosaurs in Mesozoic; trilobites in Paleozoic | Life forms change over geological time |
| Embryological | Gill slits in all vertebrate embryos | Shared early development = common ancestry |
| Anatomical (homology) | Forelimbs of whale, bat, cheetah, human | Divergent evolution from common ancestor |
| Anatomical (analogy) | Wings of butterfly & bird; eye of octopus & mammal | Convergent evolution (similar selection) |
| Molecular | Cytochrome c sequence similarity | Common ancestry; recency of divergence |
| Artificial selection | Dog breeds, crop varieties | Selection (analogue of natural selection) |
| Industrial melanism | Peppered moth (England) | Natural selection in action |
| Biogeographical | Darwin's finches; Australian marsupials | Adaptive radiation |
Interactive: Homology vs Analogy Identifier
Pick a pair of structures and learn whether they are homologous or analogous:
Classification: —
Evolution type: —
Why: —
Setup: A single ancestral seed-eating finch is blown by storm to a small island chain. Three islands have very different food: Island A has only large hard nuts; Island B has only tiny insects in tree bark; Island C has only nectar-rich tubular flowers.
Island A (hard nuts): Heavy, deep, conical beak — like a parrot or large ground finch. Force is required to crack nuts; deeper beaks generate stronger bite forces.
Island B (tiny bark insects): Long, narrow, pointed beak — like a warbler or insectivorous tree finch. Suited for probing into crevices.
Island C (tubular flowers): Long, slender, curved beak — like a hummingbird or cactus finch. Suited for reaching nectar deep inside flowers.
Principle: Natural selection favours variants whose beak best exploits the available food. Over generations, the average beak shape shifts toward the optimum for each island — adaptive radiation.
Worked Examples
Worked Example 1: Are wings of bird and bat homologous or analogous?
As forelimbs: Homologous — both contain the same bones (humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals, phalanges) inherited from a common tetrapod ancestor.
As wings: Analogous — the wing structure itself evolved independently. Bird wings have feathers attached to a few fused finger bones; bat wings have skin membrane stretched across elongated phalanges.
Conclusion: The forelimb bones are homologous (divergent evolution from tetrapod ancestor); the wing structure is analogous (convergent evolution for flight).
Worked Example 2: Explain antibiotic resistance using natural selection.
When the antibiotic is applied:
- Sensitive bacteria die.
- Resistant bacteria survive and reproduce.
- Within a few generations, the population is dominated by resistant bacteria.
Competency-Based Questions
Q1. Fossils are most likely to be found in: L1 Remember
Q2. Which is an example of analogous organs? L2 Understand
Q3. Short Answer: Differentiate between divergent evolution and convergent evolution with one example each. L2 Understand
Convergent evolution: Unrelated species independently evolve similar structures for similar functions. Example: Wings of butterfly and bird; eyes of octopus and mammal. Different origins, same function. Produces analogous structures.
Q4. Analyse: Why are Darwin's finches a classic example of adaptive radiation but not a classic example of convergent evolution? L4 Analyse
Convergent evolution requires different ancestors evolving similar structures. The finches all share the same recent ancestor, so they are diverging, not converging. The placental wolf vs. Tasmanian (marsupial) wolf would be a better example of convergence — different ancestors producing similar predator forms in different continents.
Q5. Evaluate: Critique the statement: "Lamarck was correct — the giraffe stretched its neck and passed long necks to offspring." L5 Evaluate
- Changes during the lifetime are not heritable. A weightlifter's children are not born muscular. Genes (DNA in gametes) are not modified by use or disuse of organs.
- Darwin's explanation is correct. Within any population of giraffe ancestors, neck length varied. Those with slightly longer necks could reach more leaves, survived better in dry seasons, and reproduced more. Over generations, longer necks became more common — by natural selection, not by stretching.
Assertion–Reason Questions
Choose: (A) Both true, R explains A. (B) Both true, R doesn't explain A. (C) A true, R false. (D) A false, R true.
A: The forelimbs of whales, bats and humans are homologous.
R: They contain the same arrangement of bones inherited from a common ancestor, although used for different functions.
A: Dark-winged peppered moths increased in industrial England.
R: Industrial smoke directly mutated white moths into dark moths.
A: Australian marsupials are an example of adaptive radiation.
R: Many different marsupial species evolved from a common ancestor in the isolated Australian continent.