TOPIC 7 OF 9

The Story — The Necklace

🎓 Class 10 English CBSE Theory Ch 7 — The Necklace ⏱ ~35 min
🌐 Language: [gtranslate]

This MCQ module is based on: The Story — The Necklace

[myaischool_lt_english_assessment grade_level="class_10" difficulty="intermediate"]

Before You Read — Anticipation Guide

This story by the celebrated French writer Guy de Maupassant explores the terrible price of vanity and the irony of fate. Before you read, think about the questions below.

Prediction 1: Matilda borrows a diamond necklace to wear to a grand party and then loses it. What do you predict will happen next? Will she tell her friend the truth, or will she try to hide it?
Prediction 2: Have you ever wanted something very badly — a possession, an experience — only to realise later it was not as valuable as you thought? What did that feel like?
Think About It: The story is called "The Necklace." A necklace is a piece of jewellery — but it might also stand for something deeper. What do you think a necklace could symbolise in the context of this story?

Vocabulary Warm-Up

Incessantly Without stopping; continuously
Vexation A state of irritation or distress
Ruinous Causing severe financial damage; disastrous
Usurers Money-lenders who charge very high interest rates
Awry Not in the correct position; twisted or crooked
Odious Extremely unpleasant or disagreeable
Key themes to watch for:
The price of vanity and social ambition · Situational irony (the necklace was fake all along) · The dignity of honest labour · How a single moment of dishonesty compounds into years of suffering · The contrast between Matilda's nature at the start and her character at the end.
GM
Guy de Maupassant
French Author 1850–1893 Short Story Master Realist Fiction

Guy de Maupassant is considered one of the greatest short story writers in world literature. Born in Normandy, France, he wrote nearly 300 short stories, six novels, and three travel books during his relatively short but extraordinarily productive career. His stories are celebrated for their precise, economical prose, ironic twists, and sharp observations of human nature — particularly the vanity, greed, and self-deception of middle-class French society. The Necklace (La Parure, 1884) is perhaps his most famous story, noted for its devastating twist ending.

The Story — The Necklace

1

She was one of those attractive young women who, through some cruel twist of fate, happened to be born into a family of modest government clerks. Without any dowry, any prospects, or any way of attracting a wealthy or distinguished husband, she had ended up marrying a minor official at the Board of Education. She was incessantly unhappy — not because she was naturally cruel, but because she had always felt she deserved something finer. Imagery

2

She suffered from the shabbiness of her apartment — the worn walls, the frayed chairs, the ugly curtains. She suffered at dinner, seated opposite her husband, who lifted the lid of the soup tureen with cheerful satisfaction, exclaiming that nothing could beat a good pot-pie. She dreamed instead of elegant banquets, gleaming silverware, and exquisite dishes. She had no fine dresses, no jewels — nothing. And yet she craved these things above all else.

3

She had one wealthy friend from her convent school days — Mme Forestier — but she avoided visiting her, because coming home afterwards left her weeping for days, overwhelmed by disappointment. Then one evening, her husband arrived home in high spirits, waving a large envelope. It contained an invitation from the Minister of Public Instruction and his wife to attend an evening function at the Minister's official residence the following Monday.

Read and Find Out — Check 1

What kind of person is Mme Loisel? Why is she always unhappy?
What kind of person is her husband?
Ans 1: Mme Loisel is a pretty but discontented woman who believes she deserves a life of wealth and luxury. She is not satisfied with her comfortable but modest life and constantly yearns for elegance, expensive clothes, and social admiration. Her unhappiness stems entirely from a gap between her ambitions and her reality.

Ans 2: Her husband, M. Loisel, is a patient, devoted, and practical man. He is content with simple pleasures — a good meal, a steady job — and genuinely tries to make his wife happy, even at personal sacrifice. He is kind and hardworking, though somewhat unaware of the depth of his wife's discontent.
4

Instead of delight, Matilda flung the invitation onto the table with contempt, asking what she was supposed to wear to such an event. Her husband, who had expected gratitude, was bewildered. He stammered that her theatre dress seemed perfectly fine to him. At the sight of her weeping, he fell silent. After a pause, she told him calmly — wiping her eyes — that she simply had no suitable dress and would have to decline. He offered to buy her a new one and, after much deliberation, she named a figure of four hundred francs. He had been saving exactly that amount to buy himself a hunting gun, but he handed it over without complaint.

5

As the ball drew closer, a fresh problem surfaced: Matilda was miserable that she had no jewellery. Her husband suggested she wear fresh flowers, but she found the idea humiliating. Then he had a practical idea — why not borrow jewels from her old friend Mme Forestier? Matilda went immediately and was shown a large jewel case. She tried on bracelets, a pearl collar, and a Venetian cross before discovering, in a black satin box, a superb diamond necklace. Her hands trembled as she held it. She asked to borrow it. Mme Forestier agreed, and Matilda left, clutching her treasure. Symbolism

6

The evening of the ball was a triumph for Matilda. She was the most beautiful woman in the room — graceful, radiant, smiling, intoxicated with admiration. All the men wanted to know her name. She danced with joy, thinking of nothing except this glorious, intoxicating moment of success. Her husband, meanwhile, had fallen asleep in a side room at midnight with a group of other forgotten husbands.

Read and Find Out — Check 2

What fresh problem now disturbs Mme Loisel?
How is the problem solved?
Ans 1: Mme Loisel is deeply troubled because she has no jewellery to wear with her new dress. She feels that appearing without jewels at a grand party would make her look poor and shabby, which she finds unacceptable.

Ans 2: Her husband suggests she borrow jewellery from her wealthy friend Mme Forestier. Matilda visits her friend, is shown a large jewel case, and chooses a magnificent diamond necklace, which Mme Forestier kindly lends her without hesitation.
7

They left the party around four in the morning. Matilda rushed out anxious not to be seen by the other women in her cheap wrap, which clashed so obviously with the elegance of her ball gown. They found no carriage and walked along the Seine, shivering in the cold. Eventually they found an old cab. Back home, Matilda stood before the mirror for one last look at herself in her glory — and then she screamed. The necklace was gone from her throat. Irony

8

A frantic search began. They overturned pockets and folds of clothing. Nothing. Loisel retraced the entire route on foot. He visited the police and the cab offices. He placed a newspaper advertisement offering a reward. Days passed. All hope died. Finally, Loisel declared with the gravity of a man aged by worry: they must replace the necklace. In a jeweller's shop at the Palais-Royal, they found an almost identical diamond necklace priced at forty thousand francs. They negotiated it down to thirty-six thousand. Loisel used his father's inheritance of eighteen thousand francs and borrowed the rest from usurers and money-lenders at ruinous rates of interest. The new necklace was returned to Mme Forestier, who accepted it coolly and did not open the box to inspect it. Irony

Read and Find Out — Check 3

What do M. and Mme Loisel do next?
How do they replace the necklace?
Ans 1: The Loisels first search everywhere — the dress, the cloak, the pockets — but cannot find the necklace. Loisel then goes out on foot, retraces their path, informs the police, visits cab offices, and places a reward advertisement in the newspapers — all without success.

Ans 2: After a week, they accept that the necklace is lost and decide to replace it. They find a matching one for thirty-six thousand francs. Loisel uses his entire inheritance of eighteen thousand francs and takes ruinous loans from usurers to fund the rest. The replacement necklace is quietly returned to Mme Forestier.
9

Then came the ten years of gruelling labour. They dismissed the maid, moved to cheaper lodgings in an attic. Matilda took on all the heavy household work — scrubbing floors, washing clothes, hauling water up steep stairs, shopping and bargaining at the markets with her last few coins. She became coarse and hard, with rough red hands and untidy hair. Imagery Her husband worked evenings copying accounts and nights doing freelance writing for five sous a page. Slowly, painfully, relentlessly, they paid off every centime of the debt. It took ten full years.

10

One Sunday morning, walking along the Champs-Élysées to recover from the exhaustion of the week, Matilda spotted Mme Forestier — still young, still beautiful, still as attractive as ever. She approached her and greeted her. Mme Forestier did not recognise this worn, haggard woman as her old friend and was puzzled to be addressed so familiarly. Matilda introduced herself. Mme Forestier exclaimed in shock. Matilda then told her everything — the loss of the necklace, the replacement, the decade of toil, the debt now finally paid. She spoke with simple, quiet pride. Mme Forestier stopped dead. Irony

11

"You say you bought a diamond necklace to replace mine?" Mme Forestier said slowly. "Yes — exactly like it. You never noticed?" Matilda replied with a smile of honest satisfaction. Mme Forestier took her hands, and with deep feeling said: "Oh, my poor Matilda! Mine were false. They were worth no more than five hundred francs!" Irony


Character Relationship Map

devoted husband school friend / lends necklace fate: ten years of debt Matilda Mme Loisel M. Loisel Clerk / Husband Mme Forestier Rich Friend 36,000 Francs Debt
Matilda Loisel — The Protagonist: A pretty woman born into a modest family who marries a government clerk. She is consumed by a yearning for luxury and social status. Her decision to attend the party sets in motion the events that will cost her ten years of her life. By the end, she has been transformed — stripped of vanity, hardened by labour, but ultimately honest. The tragic irony is that her suffering was entirely unnecessary.
M. Loisel — The Devoted Husband: A patient, selfless man who sacrifices his own savings and years of his life to help his wife pay for a debt caused by her vanity. He never blames her, works tirelessly, and stands by her throughout the ordeal. He represents quiet, dignified loyalty.
Mme Forestier — The Unwitting Cause: Matilda's wealthy schoolfriend, who generously lends her the necklace. She is unaware that the necklace is lost and replaced. At the end of the story, her revelation — that the necklace was fake — delivers the story's devastating final twist. She represents the world of wealth Matilda envied.
The Debt — Symbol of Consequence: The thirty-six thousand francs borrowed to replace the necklace becomes the central force of the second half of the story, driving the Loisels into poverty and reshaping both their characters entirely.

Plot Arc — Freytag's Pyramid

Exposition Rising Action Climax Falling Action Resolution
Exposition: Matilda Loisel is a young, pretty woman who is deeply discontented with her modest life as the wife of a low-ranking government clerk. She constantly dreams of wealth, luxury, and social admiration — possessions she does not have. Her husband struggles to make her happy.
Rising Action: An invitation arrives to a grand ministerial ball. Matilda uses four hundred francs of her husband's savings for a dress, then borrows a diamond necklace from her wealthy friend Mme Forestier. She is a spectacular success at the ball — radiant, admired, and intoxicated with happiness.
Climax: Returning home in the early hours, Matilda discovers the necklace is missing. Despite an exhaustive search, it cannot be found. The Loisels are faced with a catastrophic dilemma and decide to secretly replace the necklace rather than confess to their friend.
Falling Action: The Loisels borrow thirty-six thousand francs at ruinous rates to buy a replacement diamond necklace. They dismiss their maid, move into a garret, and spend ten years in grinding poverty — Matilda performing heavy labour, her husband working nights — to repay the debt.
Resolution: Ten years later, having repaid all their debts, Matilda meets Mme Forestier on the Champs-Élysées and finally confesses the truth. Mme Forestier is horrified — and reveals that the original necklace was a cheap imitation worth only five hundred francs. The entire sacrifice was unnecessary.

Word Power — Key Vocabulary

incessantly
adverb
Without ever stopping; continuously and without pause
"She suffered incessantly, feeling herself born for all delicacies and luxuries."
vexation
noun
A state of agitation, annoyance, or distress
She controlled her vexation and responded in a calm voice to her husband.
ruinous
adjective
Bringing about or causing financial ruin; disastrously costly
He took ruinous loans — promises he would spend years struggling to fulfil.
usurers
noun (plural)
Money-lenders who charge excessively high rates of interest
He borrowed from usurers and the whole race of lenders to buy the necklace.
awry
adjective / adverb
Not in the correct or expected position; twisted out of shape
Years of hard labour left her with hair badly dressed and skirts awry.
odious
adjective
Extremely unpleasant, repulsive, or deeply disliked
She learned the odious work of the kitchen — washing dishes, scrubbing floors.
Extract-Based Questions

Literature CBQ — The Necklace

Read the following extract carefully and answer the questions that follow:

"She was one of those pretty, young ladies born, as if through an error of destiny, into a family of clerks... She had no dowry, no hopes, no means of becoming known, loved, and married by a man either rich or distinguished; and she allowed herself to marry a petty clerk in the office of the Board of Education. She was simple, but she was unhappy."
Q1. What does the phrase "error of destiny" suggest about Matilda's view of her own situation?
L2 Understand
2 marks
The phrase "error of destiny" reveals Matilda's conviction that she was born into the wrong circumstances — that fate had made a mistake in placing her in a family of clerks. It shows her sense of entitlement: she believed she deserved wealth and elegance but had been cheated of it by circumstances beyond her control. This attitude of self-pity and resentment is central to her character.
Q2. The author says she "allowed herself to marry" a clerk, rather than saying she "married" him. What does this phrasing reveal?
L4 Analyse
3 marks
The phrasing "allowed herself to marry" conveys a strong sense of condescension — as if marrying this man was a compromise, a lowering of her own standards rather than a choice made with love or respect. Maupassant uses this subtle word choice to reveal her deeply superior attitude towards her own husband and to show the reader that she does not value the man who genuinely loves her. It is an early signal of the irony to come: she despises the very man who will ultimately sacrifice everything for her.
Q3. Identify and explain any ONE literary device used in this extract.
L4 Analyse
2 marks
Irony: The phrase "She was simple, but she was unhappy" is ironic because simplicity is generally considered a virtue — yet for Matilda, simplicity is her greatest source of suffering. It highlights the absurdity of her discontent: she has a stable home, a devoted husband, and a comfortable enough life, but her desire for luxury renders her incapable of appreciating any of it.
Q4. "The necklace is a symbol of the emptiness of social ambition." Do you agree? Justify with evidence from the story.
L5 Evaluate
4 marks
Yes, the necklace powerfully symbolises the emptiness of social ambition. Matilda borrows it to project an image of wealth and status she does not possess — and in doing so, sacrifices ten real years of her life for a single evening of false glamour. The devastating irony of the ending is that the necklace was never real to begin with: it was a cheap imitation worth five hundred francs. This suggests that the social status Matilda craved was itself an illusion — glittering on the surface, hollow within. Maupassant uses the necklace to argue that chasing appearances leads to genuine, irreversible ruin.
Extract-Based Questions

Literature CBQ — The Years of Labour

"Mme Loisel now knew the horrible life of necessity. She did her part, however, completely, heroically. It was necessary to pay this frightful debt. She would pay it... She learned the odious work of a kitchen. She washed the dishes... And this life lasted for ten years."
Q5. The author calls Matilda "heroic" in this passage. In what sense is she heroic here?
L4 Analyse
3 marks
Matilda is heroic here not in the traditional sense of glory, but in her quiet, uncomplaining acceptance of suffering. She does not run away, blame others, or seek an easier path — she simply works, day after day, year after year, to pay back what she owes. The irony is that the woman who was once too proud to attend a party without diamonds now scrubs floors and haggles over coins — and does so without complaint. Her heroism is a transformation born of necessity, and it is ultimately more admirable than the vanity that preceded it.
Q6. If Matilda had confessed to Mme Forestier immediately after losing the necklace, how might the story have ended differently?
L6 Create
4 marks
Had Matilda confessed immediately, the outcome would have been entirely different. Mme Forestier might have revealed at that very moment that the necklace was a fake worth only five hundred francs — a sum the Loisels could have repaid without difficulty. Ten years of poverty, crushing debt, physical deterioration, and the loss of their youth could all have been avoided. Maupassant seems to suggest that it is not bad luck that destroys Matilda, but her pride — her inability to admit a mistake to someone she had always been too ashamed to be honest with. Honesty at the moment of crisis would have saved everything.

Think About It — Comprehension Questions

Question 1 4 marks
The course of the Loisels' life changed due to the necklace. Comment.
The necklace became the pivotal event that transformed the Loisels' life entirely. Before the ball, they lived a modest but stable life — poor but not desperate. After the loss of the necklace, they were plunged into a decade of grinding poverty. They gave up their apartment, dismissed the maid, moved to an attic, and took on exhausting work. M. Loisel worked evenings and nights, while Matilda performed all the heavy household chores herself. Matilda, once a beautiful and proud young woman, became coarse, aged, and worn. All of this suffering was caused by a single moment — the loss of the necklace at the ball — and compounded by their decision to hide the truth. The story powerfully illustrates how vanity and dishonesty can cost far more than any jewel.
Question 2 4 marks
What was the cause of Matilda's ruin? How could she have avoided it?
The root cause of Matilda's ruin was her all-consuming vanity and her inability to be content with what she had. She craved luxury, admiration, and elegance that were beyond her means. When given a chance to attend a grand ball, her obsession with appearance led her to borrow a necklace she could not afford to lose — and when she did lose it, her pride prevented her from confessing the truth. She could have avoided the ruin at multiple points: by declining to attend the ball, by borrowing less conspicuous jewellery, by not rushing home in the cold (when the necklace may have been lost), or most importantly, by immediately confessing the loss to Mme Forestier, who would have revealed the necklace was fake. Every step of the disaster traces back to vanity and dishonesty.
Question 3 4 marks
What would have happened to Matilda if she had confessed to her friend that she had lost her necklace?
If Matilda had confessed immediately to Mme Forestier, the course of her life would have been entirely different. Since the original necklace was only a cheap imitation worth five hundred francs, Mme Forestier would likely have told her so — and the Loisels could have replaced it for a small sum they could manage. Ten years of poverty, the destruction of her health and appearance, and the loss of her youth could all have been avoided. The confession would have required courage and humility — qualities Matilda initially lacked — but it would have saved her from catastrophe. The story is essentially a moral argument: a moment of honest confession is always better than a lifetime of hidden consequences.
Question 4 4 marks
If you were caught in a situation like this, how would you have dealt with it?
Had I been in Matilda's position, I would have chosen honesty immediately. Confessing to a friend that you have accidentally lost something borrowed is frightening, but it is far less damaging than the alternative Matilda chose. Honesty preserves trust and allows the true value of the loss to be assessed — in this case, a simple confession would have revealed the necklace was not real diamonds at all. Beyond the practical consequences, living with a hidden lie for ten years would be psychologically unbearable. The deeper lesson I take from this story is that pride — the fear of being judged or appearing inadequate — can lead us to choices far more damaging than the mistake we were trying to conceal.

Talk About It — Discussion Questions

Discussion 1
The characters in this story speak in English. Do you think this is their language? What clues are there in the story about the language its characters must be speaking?
No — this is clearly a story set in France, and the characters would have been speaking French. The clues are abundant: the names (Matilda Loisel, Mme Forestier, M. Ramponneau), the currency (francs, sous), the setting (the Champs-Élysées, the Seine, the Palais-Royal, the Minister's residence in Paris), and the honorifics ("M." for Monsieur, "Mme" for Madame). The English we read is a translation from Maupassant's original French. This also raises an interesting question about translation: what is lost or changed when a story moves from one language and culture to another?
Discussion 2
"Honesty is the best policy." Do you think this story illustrates that statement? Give reasons.
Yes, this story is perhaps the most powerful short-story argument for honesty in English literature. Matilda's decision to hide the truth from Mme Forestier — rather than confess the loss immediately — leads directly to ten years of unnecessary poverty and suffering. Had she been honest, she would have discovered the necklace was a fake worth only five hundred francs and the whole disaster would have been averted. The story shows that dishonesty, even when motivated by pride rather than malice, has devastating long-term consequences. Maupassant's genius is in making the price of that single dishonest choice almost unbearably concrete — ten years, thirty-six thousand francs, and the ruin of two lives.
Discussion 3
"We should be content with what life gives us." Is this an appropriate moral for this story? Are there any limitations to this idea?
Contentment is certainly one of the story's key lessons — Matilda's inability to appreciate what she had is the source of all her suffering. If she had accepted her modest but stable life with gratitude, she would never have needed the ball, the dress, the necklace, or the debt. However, this moral has limitations: taken too far, it could be used to discourage legitimate ambition and social mobility. The distinction the story draws is not between ambition and contentment, but between genuine aspiration (working hard to improve one's circumstances) and vanity (pretending to be someone you are not in order to gain the admiration of others). The latter is always costly; the former can be dignified.

Grammar Workshop — Direct and Indirect Speech

The Necklace contains rich dialogue. Practice converting between direct and indirect (reported) speech using sentences from the story.

Rule: When converting from Direct to Indirect Speech, change the tense one step back (present → past, past → past perfect), adjust pronouns, and remove quotation marks. Add a reporting verb (said, told, asked, replied).
Direct: Matilda said, "I have no dress and consequently I cannot go to this affair."
Indirect: Matilda said that she had no dress and consequently could not go to that affair.
Direct: Mme Forestier said, "Mine were false. They were not worth over five hundred francs."
Indirect: Mme Forestier exclaimed that hers had been false and had not been worth over five hundred francs.

Now try these transformations:

  1. Direct: Loisel said, "We must replace this jewel."
    Convert to Indirect Speech.
  2. Direct: The husband asked, "What is the matter? What is the matter?"
    Convert to Indirect Speech.
  3. Indirect: Matilda told her friend that she had lost the diamond necklace that she had loaned her.
    Convert to Direct Speech.
1. Loisel said that they had to replace that jewel.
2. The husband asked anxiously what the matter was.
3. Matilda said to her friend, "I have lost the diamond necklace that you loaned me."

Writing Craft — From The Necklace

Writing Task 1
120–150 words
Write a diary entry as Matilda on the night she discovers the necklace is missing. Express her panic, guilt, and the difficult decision she and her husband must make.
Diary Entry Format:
───────────────────────────────
Date: Monday, 19th January (4:30 a.m.)
Dear Diary,
[Opening: emotional state as she arrives home]
[Discovery: the moment she realises the necklace is gone]
[Reaction: panic, search, despair]
[Decision: what they plan to do]
[Closing thought: a reflection on the situation]
Matilda
Sample Diary Entry:

Monday, 19th January (4:30 a.m.)

Dear Diary,

Tonight was everything I ever dreamed of — I was beautiful, admired, desired. For one perfect evening, I was the woman I always knew I should have been. And then I came home and reached for my throat — and it was not there. Jeanne's diamond necklace. Gone.
We have searched everywhere. Every fold of my dress, every pocket of Georges's coat, the entire length of the street we walked along. Nothing. My hands won't stop shaking. Georges has gone back out in the cold to look again.
We cannot tell Jeanne. She would despise me — she would think me careless, ungrateful. We will find a way to replace it. We have to. But how? How do we find thirty-six thousand francs?
God help us.
Writing Task 2
100–120 words
Write a short paragraph describing how Matilda changed over the ten years of poverty. Use contrast to show what she was like before and after.
Sample Paragraph:

Before the loss of the necklace, Matilda Loisel was a pretty, proud, and restless woman — obsessed with elegance, finery, and the admiration of others. She spent her evenings dreaming of banquets and jewels, and her days consumed by discontent. Ten years of grinding poverty changed her utterly. Her beauty faded; her hands grew red and rough from scrubbing and washing; her hair was no longer carefully arranged, and her voice, once soft, became loud and sharp with the effort of daily bargaining at markets. The woman who once wept over the absence of diamonds now hauled buckets of water up steep stairs without complaint. Necessity had stripped away vanity and left behind something tougher, and in its way, more dignified.
Vocabulary

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Necklace about in NCERT English?

The Necklace is a lesson from the NCERT English textbook that covers important literary and language concepts. The lesson includes vocabulary, literary devices, comprehension exercises, and writing tasks aligned to the CBSE curriculum.

What vocabulary is important in The Necklace?

Key vocabulary words from The Necklace are highlighted throughout with contextual meanings, usage examples, and interesting facts. Click any highlighted word to see its full definition and example sentence.

What literary devices are used in The Necklace?

The Necklace uses various literary devices including imagery, symbolism, and figurative language. These are identified with coloured tags throughout the text for easy recognition and understanding by students.

What exercises are included for The Necklace?

Exercises include extract-based comprehension questions in CBSE board exam format, grammar workshops connected to the passage, vocabulary activities, and creative writing tasks with model answers provided.

How does The Necklace help in board exam preparation?

The Necklace includes CBSE-format extract-based questions, long answer practice with model responses, and grammar exercises that mirror board exam patterns. All questions follow Bloom's Taxonomy levels L1-L6.

AI Tutor
English Footprints Without Feet Class 10
Ready
Hi! 👋 I'm Gaura, your AI Tutor for The Story — The Necklace. Take your time studying the lesson — whenever you have a doubt, just ask me! I'm here to help.