TOPIC 4 OF 9

A Question of Trust — Story

🎓 Class 10 English CBSE Theory Ch 4 — A Question of Trust ⏱ ~30 min
🌐 Language: [gtranslate]

This MCQ module is based on: A Question of Trust — Story

[myaischool_lt_english_assessment grade_level="class_10" difficulty="intermediate"]

Before You Read — Read and Find Out

This story explores two proverbs in conflict: "Set a thief to catch a thief" and "There is honour among thieves." As you read, decide which saying the story ultimately illustrates.

Read and Find Out 1: What does Horace Danby like to collect? Why does he steal every year?
Read and Find Out 2: Who is speaking to Horace Danby partway through the story? Who is the real culprit?
Think About It: Horace Danby is described as "good and respectable — but not completely honest." Is it possible to be mostly good but partly dishonest? Does the reason for stealing matter?
Predict: A thief is caught in the act by a woman in the house. She is young and charming. Horace hopes she will let him go. What do you think will happen?

Vocabulary Warm-Up

Meticulous Very careful and precise; paying great attention to detail
Culprit A person responsible for a crime or fault
Hay fever An allergy causing sneezing; caused by pollen or dust
Inconvenience Something causing difficulty or trouble
Charming Pleasantly attractive; able to influence others by appeal
Honour among thieves The idea that even criminals have a code of loyalty to each other
Central themes to watch for:
Deception within deception: Horace is a thief who is himself deceived by a cleverer thief. The story has two layers of con — Horace's con on society, and the young woman's con on Horace.
The limits of self-justification: Horace believes he is a different kind of thief — stealing only from the rich, for a good cause. The story exposes the flaw in this reasoning.
Trust and betrayal: Horace trusts the young woman because she is charming and appeals to his vanity. His trust is completely misplaced.
"Honour among thieves": The story ultimately shows there is NO honour among thieves — the young woman, a fellow criminal, betrays Horace without hesitation.
VC
Victor Canning
British Author 1911–1986 Crime Fiction Thriller Writer

Victor Canning was a prolific British crime and thriller writer who produced over 40 novels over five decades. He began his career writing short stories and later became known for his spy novels and adventure fiction. His work is characterised by economical prose, clever plotting, and a dry, ironic sensibility. A Question of Trust is a compact masterpiece of the short story form — its twist is set up so carefully that, on re-reading, the clues are all there. Canning was particularly skilled at creating sympathetic criminals and morally ambiguous situations that resist easy judgement.

Story Context
This story is set in England. "Shotover Grange" is a large country house — the kind owned by wealthy families who leave for London during certain seasons, leaving it in the care of servants. The story explores what happens when a meticulous thief with a precise moral code encounters someone with no moral code at all.

A Question of Trust — Story

1

Everyone who knew Horace Danby considered him a thoroughly good and honest citizen. He was approximately fifty years old, unmarried, and lived with a housekeeper who fussed over his wellbeing. In general, he was healthy and contented — except for his annual summer attacks of hay fever. He manufactured locks and was successful enough at his trade to employ two assistants. Yes, Horace Danby was considered good and respectable — though not entirely honest. Irony

2

Fifteen years earlier, Horace had served his one and only prison sentence — in a library, fortunately — and had discovered his passionate love for rare, expensive books. Since then, he had robbed a safe exactly once every year. Each year he planned with great care, stole precisely enough to last twelve months, and then quietly purchased the books he loved through an intermediary. Irony

3

Now, walking through the bright July sunshine, he felt confident that this year's robbery would go as smoothly as all the others. For a fortnight he had been studying Shotover Grange in detail — its rooms, its electrical wiring, its pathways and garden. That afternoon the two servants who remained at the Grange while the family was in London had gone to the cinema. Horace watched them leave, then emerged from behind the garden wall with his bag of tools. He noted with slight annoyance a tickle of hay fever in his nose. Irony

4

Inside the house, the safe in the drawing room contained approximately fifteen thousand pounds' worth of jewels. If he sold them gradually, he expected to realise at least five thousand — enough to sustain him comfortably for another year and acquire three rather interesting books coming up for auction that autumn. He found the kitchen key where the housekeeper had left it hanging outside on a hook. He pulled on his gloves — he was always careful about fingerprints — took the key, and opened the door. A small dog lay in the kitchen. It stirred, wagged its tail in a friendly way. "Good dog, Sherry," Horace said in a low voice. The trick with dogs was simply to know their name and show them a little affection. Imagery

5

The safe was in the drawing room, concealed behind a rather mediocre painting. Horace briefly considered whether he ought to be collecting paintings instead of books — but no, they took up far too much space. A large bowl of flowers stood on the table, and the scent made his nose prickle at once. He laid down his tools carefully. He had four hours before the servants returned. The safe was not going to be difficult. After all, locks and safes had been his life's work. He went to the hallway to cut the burglar alarm wire, returned, and sneezed vigorously as the floral fragrance struck him again. A magazine article — he had even read it himself — had described this very house, given a plan of all its rooms, and mentioned that the painting concealed a safe. How foolish wealthy people were, he thought. Irony

Read and Find Out — Section 1

What does Horace Danby collect? Why does he steal only once a year?
How has Horace prepared for this particular robbery? What precautions has he taken?
Ans 1: Horace collects rare, expensive books — a passion he developed during his only prison sentence, which he served in a library. He steals once a year because he plans meticulously, steals exactly what he needs for twelve months, and never risks greed by taking more.

Ans 2: He has spent two weeks studying the house — its layout, wiring, paths, and garden. He has identified when the servants would be away. He wears gloves to avoid fingerprints, knows the dog's name to keep it quiet, has located the key, disabled the burglar alarm, and even read a magazine article describing the room's layout. He is an extremely careful, professional thief.
6

He was burying his nose in his handkerchief when he heard a voice from the doorway: "What is it — a cold, or hay fever?" Before he could consider his response, Horace answered automatically, "Hay fever" — and found himself sneezing again. The voice continued warmly: "You can cure that, you know, if you identify the specific plant that triggers it. You really should see a doctor — I could hear you from the top of the house." Irony

7

A young woman was standing in the doorway. She was quite attractive, dressed in red, and carried herself with calm confidence. She walked to the fireplace and straightened some ornaments. The dog rubbed against her legs. "Down, Sherry," she said cheerfully. "Anyone would think I'd been away for a month!" She smiled at Horace and added, "I came back just in time, it seems — though I hadn't expected to meet a burglar." Irony

8

Horace felt a cautious hope flicker. She seemed more amused than alarmed. If he managed this correctly, he might still escape. "I hadn't expected to meet one of the family," he replied. She nodded sympathetically. "I see what an inconvenience my arrival is for you. What are you going to do?" Horace said his first thought had been to run. She said she would telephone the police and they would catch him at once. He suggested he could cut the telephone wires and ensure she was unable to do anything for a few hours. She looked at him searchingly: "You'd hurt me?" He hesitated. "I think," he said honestly, "I was trying to frighten you. It didn't seem to work." Imagery

9

He asked her simply to forget she had ever seen him and let him go. She refused — if she let him go, he would only rob someone else. Society had to be protected from men like him. Horace smiled with genuine feeling: "I'm not someone who threatens society in any real sense. I steal only from those who have far more than they need. I steal for a very specific reason. And I have a genuine dread of prison." She laughed at his earnestness, and he begged with sudden urgency: "Look — I have no right to ask you for anything. But I'm desperate. Let me go, and I promise on my honour — I will never do this again. I truly mean it." Irony

Read and Find Out — Section 2

Who is the woman who appears in the doorway? What does Horace initially think of her?
How does the woman persuade Horace to open the safe for her? What is her reason?
Ans 1: Horace initially assumes the woman is a member of the family who own Shotover Grange — most likely the wife or daughter of the owner. She acts with complete confidence in the house, knows the dog's name, and straightens ornaments as if she belongs there. Horace thinks she might be sympathetic to him because she seems amused rather than frightened.

Ans 2: The woman tells Horace she had promised her husband to take her jewels to the bank before the family left for London — but she forgot and left them in the safe. She has now come back to collect them for a party that evening, but cannot remember the combination. She offers to let Horace go free if he opens the safe for her. Horace, desperate to escape and charmed by her manner, agrees — and even removes his gloves to work more delicately.
10

She watched him in silence for a moment, then said with a slow smile: "I have always had a weakness for the wrong kind of people." She picked up a small silver box from the table and helped herself to a cigarette. Horace, eager to demonstrate goodwill, pulled off one of his gloves and held out his lighter for her. "You'll let me go?" he said, holding the lighter towards her. "Yes," she replied. "But only if you will do something for me first." She explained: before leaving for London, she had promised her husband to deposit her jewels in the bank — but she had forgotten. Now she needed them for a party that evening. She had come back for them. But — she smiled apologetically — she had forgotten the combination numbers. "You've forgotten the combination, haven't you?" Horace said softly. She nodded. "Just leave it to me," he said. "You'll have them within an hour — though I may have to break the lock." "Don't worry about that," she said pleasantly. "My husband won't be back for a month, and I'll have the safe repaired by then." Irony

11

Within an hour, Horace had opened the safe, handed her the jewels, and left — feeling, surprisingly, rather pleased with himself. For two days he kept his promise to the kind young woman and did not attempt any further theft. On the morning of the third day, however, he remembered the books he wanted, and he knew he would need to find another safe to rob. He never got the chance. By midday, a police officer had arrived and arrested him for the jewel robbery at Shotover Grange. Irony

12

His fingerprints — for he had removed his gloves to work the safe more carefully — were found throughout the room. Nobody believed him when he explained that the wife of the owner had asked him to open it for her. The actual wife of the owner turned out to be a grey-haired, sharp-tongued woman of sixty who dismissed the whole story as complete nonsense. Horace is now assistant librarian in the prison. He thinks often of the charming, clever young woman who was in the same profession as he was — and who tricked him so completely. He grows very angry whenever anyone mentions the phrase "honour among thieves." Irony

Character Map — A Question of Trust

tricks / uses real wife; denies his passion; motive his fatal mistake Horace Danby Young Woman Real Wife (60) Rare Books Removed Gloves
Horace Danby — The Tricked Thief: A meticulous, careful, once-a-year burglar who genuinely believes he is a different kind of criminal — he steals only from the rich, only for books, and causes no violence. His self-justification is his fatal flaw: it makes him susceptible to being charmed by someone who appeals to his sense of a "reasonable" arrangement between fellow thieves.
The Young Woman in Red — The Real Culprit: A young, charming, confident woman who is herself a thief — far cleverer than Horace. She exploits his assumption that she is the lady of the house, his desire to avoid prison, and his vanity (she calls herself someone who likes "the wrong kind of people"). She manipulates him into opening the safe without gloves, then turns him in.
The Real Wife: A grey-haired, sharp-tongued woman of sixty — the actual owner's wife — who has never met Horace and dismisses his story entirely. Her existence is the story's final, devastating irony: the "wife" who persuaded Horace was an imposter, and the real wife's denial seals his fate.
Rare Books — The Motive: Horace's passion for rare, expensive books is both his character's most sympathetic quality and his undoing. It is the reason he steals — he cannot afford the books on his legitimate income. His love of books (nurtured in a prison library!) is an ironic detail that makes him simultaneously more human and more culpable.
The Removed Gloves — The Fatal Mistake: Horace always wears gloves to avoid fingerprints — it is one of his most consistent precautions. When the young woman asks him to open the safe, he removes a glove to hold out his lighter for her cigarette — and then removes both gloves to work the delicate lock. This single lapse, caused by his desire to please her, leaves his fingerprints everywhere and makes his conviction certain.
📚

Extract-Based Questions (Literature CBQ)

"Horace is now the assistant librarian in the prison. He often thinks of the charming, clever young lady who was in the same profession as he was, and who tricked him. He gets very angry when anyone talks about 'honour among thieves'."
Q1. What does "in the same profession" mean here? What is ironic about this phrase?
L2 Understand
"In the same profession" means the young woman was also a thief — a burglar, like Horace. The phrase uses the word "profession" (a respectable career) to describe criminal activity — an irony that reflects Horace's tendency to think of his own thieving as a kind of skilled trade. The deeper irony is that the person who outwitted the careful, experienced thief was another thief who was simply cleverer and more ruthless.
Q2. Why does Horace "get very angry" when anyone mentions "honour among thieves"?
L4 Analyse
Horace believed — on some level — in the idea that thieves have a code of loyalty to each other. He trusted the young woman partly because she seemed to understand his world and make a reasonable offer between two people on the same side of the law. Her betrayal completely destroyed this belief. "Honour among thieves" is now a phrase that mocks him: he extended trust to a fellow thief and was completely and cold-bloodedly betrayed. His anger is the anger of someone whose worldview — however flawed — has been destroyed.
Q3. "Horace Danby was good and respectable — but not completely honest." Analyse why this description is apt. Why can't he be called a typical thief?
L4 Analyse
The description is apt because Horace genuinely is good in most respects: he runs a legitimate business, employs people, is kind to his housekeeper, gentle with a dog, non-violent, and steals only once a year with surgical precision. He is not a career criminal or a violent offender. Yet he steals — consistently, deliberately, dishonestly. He is not a typical thief because he has a moral code and a reason he considers noble. But the story refuses to excuse him on these grounds. His rationalisation — "I steal only from those who have a lot" — is precisely the kind of self-serving logic that all criminals use to justify themselves. He cannot be categorised as purely bad or purely good — which is what makes him such an interesting character.
Q4. "Horace Danby was a meticulous planner but still he faltered." Where exactly did he go wrong, and why? [HOT]
L5 Evaluate
Horace's plan was technically perfect — he had studied the house for a fortnight, disabled the alarm, identified the servants' absence, and worn gloves. He faltered at a single point: he trusted someone he had no reason to trust. His trust was triggered by several factors: (1) he assumed she was the owner's wife because she behaved as if she belonged; (2) she appealed to his self-image as a reasonable, non-violent thief who could make arrangements with fellow "understanding" people; (3) he was charmed by her and wanted to please her — he removed a glove to hold out his lighter. This small, gallant gesture destroyed him. The lesson is that preparation and intelligence are insufficient if your judgment of character is wrong. His greatest weakness was not his hay fever or his love of books — it was his susceptibility to charm and his desire to be seen as honourable.

Word Power — Key Vocabulary

meticulous
adjective
Taking or showing great care and precision; attending carefully to detail
"Horace was a meticulous planner — two weeks of study before every robbery."
hay fever
noun (medical)
An allergic reaction to pollen or dust, causing sneezing, runny eyes, and congestion. Horace's hay fever is a structural irony — his careful plan is undone by an involuntary sneeze.
"Horace felt his hay fever rising as the scent of the flowers reached him."
inconvenience
noun / verb
A situation that causes difficulty, trouble, or discomfort; something that disturbs a plan
"I see what an inconvenience it is for you to meet me" — the woman's ironic politeness to the burglar.
culprit
noun
A person responsible for a crime or wrongdoing
"Who is the real culprit in the story?" — the Read and Find Out question that reveals the twist.
honour among thieves
idiom / proverb
The idea that criminals maintain loyalty and a code of ethics among themselves; they will not betray each other
"He gets very angry when anyone mentions 'honour among thieves'" — because the young woman proved there is none.
set a thief to catch a thief
proverb
The best person to catch a criminal is someone who knows criminal methods — a fellow criminal
The story illustrates this proverb: the young woman, herself a thief, catches Horace by out-thinking him at his own game.

Think About It — Comprehension Exercises

Q1 3 marks
Did you begin to suspect, before the end of the story, that the lady was not who Horace took her to be? At what point, and how?
A careful reader might begin to suspect something is wrong when the young woman appears remarkably calm for someone who has just walked in on a burglar. Real homeowners typically react with fear, anger, or both — she is merely amused. Her line "I have always liked the wrong kind of people" is another clue: a real owner's wife would be unlikely to say this. Most tellingly, her story about needing the jewels for a party that very night and having forgotten the combination is almost too convenient — it is exactly the kind of story designed to make Horace offer to help. On re-reading, the clues are everywhere; on first reading, her charm and confidence are designed to prevent suspicion.
Q2 3 marks
What are the subtle ways in which the lady manages to deceive Horace into thinking she is the lady of the house?
The young woman's deception works through several subtle techniques: (1) She addresses the dog — Sherry — by name, suggesting familiarity with the house. (2) She straightens ornaments on the fireplace as if it is natural habit. (3) She says "Anyone would think I'd been away for a month!" — implying she is returning home. (4) She knows about the family being in London and the husband's planned return in a month. (5) She speaks with complete calm and authority — not the behaviour of a stranger. Each detail alone might be coincidental; taken together, they construct a perfect illusion of ownership. Horace does not question any of it because she fills the role so convincingly.
Q3 2 marks
Do you think Horace Danby was unfairly punished, or that he deserved what he got?
This is an open question, but a balanced answer acknowledges both sides. On one hand, Horace was genuinely tricked — he was manipulated into a situation he did not plan, and was then betrayed. On the other hand, he had gone to Shotover Grange specifically to rob it. He was not an innocent victim — he was a thief who was outwitted by a cleverer thief. The story does not invite sympathy for Horace exactly, but it does suggest that the manner of his punishment is more about fate's dark irony than straightforward justice. He is punished not for planning a robbery but for trusting someone he shouldn't have — which is itself a form of poetic justice for a man who relied on the gullibility of others.

Talk About It — Discussion Questions

Q1: Do you think Horace Danby was unfairly punished, or did he deserve what he got? Can you think of other situations where someone who was doing wrong was punished in a way that still feels unjust?
Q2: Do intentions justify actions? Would you, like Horace Danby, do something wrong if you thought your ends justified the means? Are there situations where acting dishonestly is excusable?
For Q1: The story deliberately makes Horace a sympathetic figure to complicate easy judgement. Key discussion points: What is the difference between legal punishment and moral justice? Can a wrong method of punishment still produce a just outcome? Is there such a thing as a victimless crime?

For Q2: This is a classic ethical debate about consequentialism (ends justify means) vs. deontology (certain actions are wrong regardless of outcome). Guide students to consider: where does the logic of "justified" dishonesty stop? Horace used the same logic — and it led him to prison. Real examples from history (Robin Hood, whistleblowers, civil disobedience) add depth.
Vocabulary

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A Question of Trust about in NCERT English?

A Question of Trust is a lesson from the NCERT English textbook that covers important literary and language concepts. The lesson includes vocabulary, literary devices, comprehension exercises, and writing tasks aligned to the CBSE curriculum.

What vocabulary is important in A Question of Trust?

Key vocabulary words from A Question of Trust are highlighted throughout with contextual meanings, usage examples, and interesting facts. Click any highlighted word to see its full definition and example sentence.

What literary devices are used in A Question of Trust?

A Question of Trust uses various literary devices including imagery, symbolism, and figurative language. These are identified with coloured tags throughout the text for easy recognition and understanding by students.

What exercises are included for A Question of Trust?

Exercises include extract-based comprehension questions in CBSE board exam format, grammar workshops connected to the passage, vocabulary activities, and creative writing tasks with model answers provided.

How does A Question of Trust help in board exam preparation?

A Question of Trust includes CBSE-format extract-based questions, long answer practice with model responses, and grammar exercises that mirror board exam patterns. All questions follow Bloom's Taxonomy levels L1-L6.

AI Tutor
English Footprints Without Feet Class 10
Ready
Hi! 👋 I'm Gaura, your AI Tutor for A Question of Trust — Story. Take your time studying the lesson — whenever you have a doubt, just ask me! I'm here to help.