This MCQ module is based on: Exercises — Federalism
Exercises — Federalism
Exercises — Federalism
NCERT Democratic Politics-II | Chapter 2: Federalism — End-of-Chapter Exercises
Key Terms for Federalism — Quick Revision Guide
NCERT Textbook Exercises for Federalism Chapter 2
Similarity: Both India and Belgium are 'Holding Together' federations where a large or diverse country divided power between the central and regional governments to accommodate diversity. Both have constitutionally guaranteed powers for regional/state governments.
Difference: India has a three-fold distribution of legislative powers (Union, State, and Concurrent Lists), whereas Belgium's federal arrangement is primarily structured around linguistic communities (Dutch, French, German) and regions, with a unique "community government" system that has no parallel in India.
Example: In India (federal), the state government of Karnataka can independently legislate on police matters (a State List subject) without seeking permission from the Central Government. In Sri Lanka (unitary), provincial councils derive their power from the national government, which can modify or withdraw those powers whenever it wishes.
| Before 1992 | After 1992 |
|---|---|
| Elections to local bodies were not held regularly; state governments could postpone them indefinitely. | It became constitutionally mandatory to hold regular elections to local government bodies. |
| Local bodies had no independent powers or resources and were directly controlled by state governments. | State governments are now required to share powers and revenue with local bodies. An independent State Election Commission was created. At least one-third of seats are reserved for women. |
Since the United States is a ______________ type of federation, all the constituent States have equal powers and States are ______________ vis-a-vis the federal government. But India is a ______________ type of federation and some States have more power than others. In India, the ______________ government has more powers.
- Sangeeta: The policy of accommodation has strengthened national unity.
- Arman: Language-based States have divided us by making everyone conscious of their language.
- Harish: This policy has only helped to consolidate the dominance of English over all other languages.
Supporting Sangeeta: The policy of accommodation — recognising 22 Scheduled Languages, allowing states to have their own official languages, and continuing English alongside Hindi — has prevented the kind of linguistic conflict seen in Sri Lanka. When the anti-Hindi agitation erupted in Tamil Nadu in the 1960s, the Central Government responded flexibly instead of imposing Hindi. This accommodation ensured that no linguistic group felt excluded, thereby strengthening unity.
Supporting Arman: One could argue that language-based states created strong regional identities that sometimes come into conflict with national identity. Disputes over river waters, border areas between linguistic states, and demands for recognition of more languages in the Eighth Schedule suggest that linguistic identity can become a source of tension. However, this view overlooks the fact that most such disputes are resolved through democratic means.
Supporting Harish: Despite the promotion of Hindi and recognition of regional languages, English continues to dominate higher education, judiciary, and corporate sectors. Those who are proficient in English enjoy significant advantages in employment and social mobility, potentially marginalising non-English speakers. The continuation of English can be seen as privileging an urban, elite minority.
A. Defence B. Police C. Agriculture D. Education E. Banking F. Forests G. Communications H. Trade I. Marriages
| Union List | State List | Concurrent List |
|---|---|---|
| A. Defence E. Banking G. Communications |
B. Police C. Agriculture H. Trade |
D. Education F. Forests I. Marriages |
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Union of India | A. Prime Minister |
| 2. State | B. Sarpanch |
| 3. Municipal Corporation | C. Governor |
| 4. Gram Panchayat | D. Mayor |
A. In a federation, the powers of the federal and provincial governments are clearly demarcated.
B. India is a federation because the powers of the Union and State Governments are specified in the Constitution and they have exclusive jurisdiction on their respective subjects.
C. Sri Lanka is a federation because the country is divided into provinces.
D. India is no longer a federation because some powers of the States have been devolved to the local government bodies.
Statement A is correct — clear demarcation of powers is a defining feature of federalism.
Statement B is correct — India's Constitution specifies powers through Union, State, and Concurrent Lists with exclusive jurisdictions.
Statement C is incorrect — Sri Lanka is not a federation. Having provinces does not make a country federal; what matters is whether those provinces have constitutionally guaranteed, independent authority (which Sri Lanka's provinces do not).
Statement D is incorrect — Devolving power to local bodies does not end federalism. In fact, it adds a third tier to the federal structure, strengthening decentralisation within the federal framework.
Reason (R): India is a 'holding together' federation where the central government needs to be more powerful while still respecting state autonomy.
Reason (R): Before 1992, panchayat and municipal elections were conducted by the Election Commission of India.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are important questions for Federalism Class 10?
Important questions for Federalism Class 10 include defining federalism and its key features, comparing coming together and holding together federations, explaining the three-fold distribution of legislative powers in India, describing how linguistic states strengthened Indian federalism, analysing the role of the 73rd and 74th Amendments, and discussing how coalition politics has changed Centre-State relations. Students should prepare both short-answer and long-answer questions on these topics.
What is the difference between Union List and State List?
The Union List contains subjects of national importance like defence, foreign affairs, banking, and communications on which only the central government can make laws. It has 97 subjects. The State List contains subjects of local importance like police, agriculture, trade, and public health on which only state governments legislate. It has 66 subjects. This clear division of subjects is a fundamental feature of Indian federalism established under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.
What is a coalition government in federalism?
A coalition government is formed when no single political party wins enough seats to form a government on its own and must ally with other parties. In the context of federalism, coalition governments have strengthened India's federal structure since the late 1980s by requiring the ruling party to accommodate the interests of regional allies. This has given state-level and regional parties greater influence in national governance and ensured respect for state autonomy.
How do you answer CBQ questions on Federalism?
To answer CBQ questions on Federalism effectively, first read the source passage carefully and identify whether it describes federal features, unitary features, or decentralisation. Apply your textbook knowledge to the scenario presented rather than simply recalling definitions. Use specific examples from the NCERT text such as the three lists, linguistic reorganisation, or the Panchayati Raj system. Structure answers with a clear topic sentence, evidence from the passage, and connecting analysis.
What is the summary of Federalism Chapter 2 Class 10?
Federalism, Chapter 2 of NCERT Class 10 Democratic Politics, explains how power is shared between different levels of government. It covers the definition and features of federalism, contrasts federal and unitary systems, and explains coming together vs holding together routes. For India, it discusses the constitutional division through Union, State, and Concurrent lists, linguistic reorganisation of states, language policy, and the evolution of Centre-State relations through coalition politics, concluding with decentralisation.