This MCQ module is based on: Types of Relations – Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence
Types of Relations – Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence
This mathematics assessment will be based on: Types of Relations – Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence
Targeting Class 12 level in Functions, with Advanced difficulty.
Upload images, PDFs, or Word documents to include their content in assessment generation.
1.1 Introduction
In Class XI, we explored the concepts of relations, functions, domain, co-domain, and range along with various types of real-valued functions and their graphs. The term relation? in mathematics captures whether two objects or quantities share a recognisable connection. For instance, if A is the set of students in Class XII and B is the set of students in Class XI of the same school, we can form relations such as "\(a\) is a brother of \(b\)" or "\(a\) is a sister of \(b\)".
Mathematically, a relation R from set A to set B is any arbitrary subset of \(A \times B\). If \((a, b) \in R\), we say \(a\) is related to \(b\) under R and write \(a\,R\,b\). In general, we do not require a recognisable link between \(a\) and \(b\) — the pair simply belongs to R. Functions, as we recall from Class XI, are a special kind of relation.
In this chapter, we study different types of relations and functions, composition of functions, invertible functions, and binary operations.
1.2 Types of Relations
A relation in a set A is a subset of \(A \times A\). Two extreme cases arise naturally:
Both the empty relation and the universal relation are sometimes called trivial relations?.
Worked Example 1
Let A be the set of all students of a boys' school. Show that R = {(\(a, b\)) : \(a\) is sister of \(b\)} is the empty relation and R' = {(\(a, b\)) : the difference between heights of \(a\) and \(b\) is less than 3 metres} is the universal relation.
It is also obvious that the difference between heights of any two students must be less than 3 metres. This shows that \(R' = A \times A\) is the universal relation.
One of the most important relations in mathematics is an equivalence relation?. To study it, we first consider three types of relations: reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
(i) Reflexive, if \((a, a) \in R\) for every \(a \in A\).
(ii) Symmetric, if \((a_1, a_2) \in R\) implies that \((a_2, a_1) \in R\) for all \(a_1, a_2 \in A\).
(iii) Transitive, if \((a_1, a_2) \in R\) and \((a_2, a_3) \in R\) implies that \((a_1, a_3) \in R\) for all \(a_1, a_2, a_3 \in A\).
Worked Example 2
Let T be the set of all triangles in a plane and R be the relation defined as R = {(\(T_1, T_2\)) : \(T_1\) is congruent to \(T_2\)}. Show that R is an equivalence relation.
Symmetric: If \(T_1\) is congruent to \(T_2\), then \(T_2\) is congruent to \(T_1\). So \((T_1, T_2) \in R \Rightarrow (T_2, T_1) \in R\). Hence R is symmetric.
Transitive: If \(T_1\) is congruent to \(T_2\) and \(T_2\) is congruent to \(T_3\), then \(T_1\) is congruent to \(T_3\). So \((T_1, T_2) \in R\) and \((T_2, T_3) \in R \Rightarrow (T_1, T_3) \in R\). Hence R is transitive.
Since R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it is an equivalence relation.
Worked Example 3
Let L be the set of all lines in a plane and R be the relation defined as R = {(\(L_1, L_2\)) : \(L_1\) is perpendicular to \(L_2\)}. Show that R is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.
Symmetric: If \(L_1 \perp L_2\), then \(L_2 \perp L_1\). So \((L_1, L_2) \in R \Rightarrow (L_2, L_1) \in R\). R is symmetric.
Not transitive: If \(L_1 \perp L_2\) and \(L_2 \perp L_3\), then \(L_1 \parallel L_3\) (not perpendicular). So \((L_1, L_2) \in R\) and \((L_2, L_3) \in R\) but \((L_1, L_3) \notin R\). R is not transitive.
Worked Example 4
Show that the relation R in the set {1, 2, 3} given by R = {(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (1, 2), (2, 3)} is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Not symmetric: (1, 2) \(\in\) R but (2, 1) \(\notin\) R. So R is not symmetric.
Not transitive: (1, 2) \(\in\) R and (2, 3) \(\in\) R but (1, 3) \(\notin\) R. So R is not transitive.
Worked Example 5
Show that the relation R in the set Z of integers given by R = {(\(a, b\)) : 2 divides \(a - b\)} is an equivalence relation.
Symmetric: If \((a, b) \in R\), then 2 divides \(a - b\). Hence 2 divides \(b - a = -(a-b)\). So \((b, a) \in R\).
Transitive: If \((a, b) \in R\) and \((b, c) \in R\), then 2 divides \(a - b\) and 2 divides \(b - c\). Now, \(a - c = (a - b) + (b - c)\). Since 2 divides both summands, 2 divides \(a - c\). So \((a, c) \in R\).
R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Hence R is an equivalence relation.
In Example 5, note that all even integers are related to zero (since \(a - 0 = a\) is even), and all odd integers are related to 1 (since \(a - 1\) is even when \(a\) is odd). The set E of all even integers and the set O of all odd integers form equivalence classes? with \(\mathbf{Z} = E \cup O\) and \(E \cap O = \phi\).
Note that [0] = [2] = [−4] = ... (any even integer) and [1] = [3] = [−5] = ... (any odd integer).
For an arbitrary equivalence relation R in a set X, R divides X into mutually disjoint subsets \(A_i\) called partitions (or subdivisions), satisfying:
(i) all elements of \(A_i\) are related to each other, for all \(i\);
(ii) no element of \(A_i\) is related to any element of \(A_j\) when \(i \ne j\);
(iii) \(\cup A_i = X\) and \(A_i \cap A_j = \phi\) for \(i \ne j\).
Worked Example 6
Let R be the relation defined in the set A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} by R = {(\(a, b\)) : both \(a\) and \(b\) are either odd or even}. Show that R is an equivalence relation. Further, show that all elements of the subset {1, 3, 5, 7} are related to each other and all elements of the subset {2, 4, 6} are related to each other, but no element of {1, 3, 5, 7} is related to any element of {2, 4, 6}.
Symmetric: If \((a, b) \in R\), then \(a\) and \(b\) are both odd or both even. But then \(b\) and \(a\) are also both odd or both even. So \((b, a) \in R\).
Transitive: If \((a, b) \in R\) and \((b, c) \in R\), then \(a, b\) have the same parity and \(b, c\) have the same parity. Therefore, \(a\) and \(c\) share the same parity. So \((a, c) \in R\).
Hence R is an equivalence relation. The two equivalence classes are {1, 3, 5, 7} (odd) and {2, 4, 6} (even). No element of {1, 3, 5, 7} can be related to any element of {2, 4, 6} since one is odd and the other is even.
- Take A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} and the relation R = {(a, b) : 3 divides (a − b)}.
- Start with element 1. Find all elements related to 1: since 3 divides (a − 1), we need a − 1 = 0, ±3, ±6, ... So a = 1, 4, 7.
- Now take element 2: a − 2 divisible by 3 gives a = 2, 5, 8.
- Element 3: a − 3 divisible by 3 gives a = 3, 6, 9.
- Verify: Are there any leftover elements? 1,4,7 and 2,5,8 and 3,6,9 cover all of A.
Observation: Three equivalence classes form: [1] = {1, 4, 7}, [2] = {2, 5, 8}, [3] = {3, 6, 9}.
Explanation: Since we divide by 3, there are exactly 3 possible remainders (0, 1, 2). Elements with the same remainder when divided by 3 form one equivalence class. This is the foundation of modular arithmetic!
Exercise 1.1
(i) Relation R in A = {1, 2, 3, ..., 13, 14} defined as R = {(x, y) : 3x − y = 0}
(ii) Relation R in N defined as R = {(x, y) : y = x + 5 and x < 4}
(iii) Relation R in A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} as R = {(x, y) : y is divisible by x}
(iv) Relation R in Z defined as R = {(x, y) : x − y is an integer}
(v) Relation R in the set A of human beings at a particular time given by
(a) R = {(x, y) : x and y work at the same place}
(b) R = {(x, y) : x and y live in the same locality}
(c) R = {(x, y) : x is exactly 7 cm taller than y}
(d) R = {(x, y) : x is wife of y}
(e) R = {(x, y) : x is father of y}
Reflexive: (1,1) \(\notin\) R. Not reflexive.
Symmetric: (1,3) \(\in\) R but (3,1) \(\notin\) R. Not symmetric.
Transitive: (1,3) and (3,9) \(\in\) R but (1,9) \(\notin\) R. Not transitive.
(ii) R = {(1,6),(2,7),(3,8)}.
Not reflexive: (1,1) \(\notin\) R. Not symmetric: (1,6) \(\in\) R but (6,1) \(\notin\) R. Not transitive: no pair (a,b) and (b,c) both in R.
Neither reflexive, nor symmetric, nor transitive.
(iii) Reflexive: \(x\) divides \(x\) for all \(x \in A\). Yes.
Symmetric: (1,2) \(\in\) R (2 is divisible by 1) but (2,1) \(\notin\) R (1 not divisible by 2). Not symmetric.
Transitive: If \(y\) is divisible by \(x\) and \(z\) is divisible by \(y\), then \(z\) is divisible by \(x\). Yes.
Reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
(iv) Reflexive: \(x - x = 0\) is an integer. Yes.
Symmetric: If \(x - y\) is an integer, then \(y - x = -(x-y)\) is also an integer. Yes.
Transitive: If \(x - y\) and \(y - z\) are integers, then \(x - z = (x-y)+(y-z)\) is an integer. Yes.
Equivalence relation.
(v)(a) Reflexive: x works at the same place as x. Yes. Symmetric: obvious. Transitive: obvious. Equivalence relation.
(v)(b) Same reasoning as (a). Equivalence relation.
(v)(c) Not reflexive: x is not 7 cm taller than x. Not symmetric: if x is 7 cm taller than y, then y is NOT 7 cm taller than x. Not transitive: if x is 7 cm taller than y and y is 7 cm taller than z, then x is 14 cm taller than z, not 7. None of the three.
(v)(d) Not reflexive: x is not wife of x. Not symmetric: if x is wife of y, y is husband of x (not wife). Not transitive: no chain possible. None of the three.
(v)(e) Not reflexive: x is not father of x. Not symmetric: if x is father of y, y is not father of x. Not transitive: if x is father of y and y is father of z, then x is grandfather of z, not father. None of the three.
Not symmetric: \((1, 4) \in R\) since \(1 \leq 16\), but \((4, 1) \notin R\) since \(4 \leq 1\) is false.
Not transitive: \((3, 2) \in R\) since \(3 \leq 4\), and \((2, 1.5) \in R\) since \(2 \leq 2.25\), but \((3, 1.5) \notin R\) since \(3 \leq 2.25\) is false.
Not reflexive: (1,1) \(\notin\) R since \(1 \neq 1+1\).
Not symmetric: (1,2) \(\in\) R but (2,1) \(\notin\) R.
Not transitive: (1,2) \(\in\) R and (2,3) \(\in\) R but (1,3) \(\notin\) R (since \(3 \neq 1+1\)).
R is neither reflexive, nor symmetric, nor transitive.
Not symmetric: \((1, 2) \in R\) since \(1 \leq 2\), but \((2, 1) \notin R\) since \(2 \leq 1\) is false.
Transitive: If \(a \leq b\) and \(b \leq c\), then \(a \leq c\). Yes.
Not symmetric: Take \(a = 1, b = 2\). \(1 \leq 8\) is true, so \((1, 2) \in R\). But \(2 \leq 1\) is false, so \((2, 1) \notin R\).
Not transitive: \((25, 3) \in R\) since \(25 \leq 27\), \((3, \frac{3}{2}) \in R\) since \(3 \leq \frac{27}{8} = 3.375\), but \((25, \frac{3}{2}) \notin R\) since \(25 \leq \frac{27}{8}\) is false.
Not reflexive: (1,1), (2,2), (3,3) all \(\notin\) R.
Not transitive: (1,2) \(\in\) R and (2,1) \(\in\) R but (1,1) \(\notin\) R.
Symmetric: If x and y have the same number of pages, then y and x also have the same number of pages. So (x, y) \(\in\) R \(\Rightarrow\) (y, x) \(\in\) R.
Transitive: If x and y have the same page count, and y and z have the same page count, then x and z have the same page count.
Hence R is an equivalence relation.
Symmetric: \(|a - b| = |b - a|\). If one is even, so is the other. Yes.
Transitive: If \(|a - b|\) is even and \(|b - c|\) is even, then \(a - b\) is even and \(b - c\) is even, so \(a - c = (a-b) + (b-c)\) is even. Hence \(|a - c|\) is even. Yes.
R is an equivalence relation. The equivalence classes are {1, 3, 5} (odd numbers) and {2, 4} (even numbers). Since odd minus even is always odd (not even), no element of {1, 3, 5} is related to any element of {2, 4}.
(i) R = {(a, b) : |a − b| is a multiple of 4}
(ii) R = {(a, b) : a = b}
is an equivalence relation. Find the set of all elements related to 1 in each case.
Symmetric: \(|a-b| = |b-a|\). Yes.
Transitive: If 4 divides \(|a-b|\) and 4 divides \(|b-c|\), then 4 divides \(|a-c|\) (since \(a-c = (a-b) + (b-c)\)). Yes.
Set of elements related to 1: \(|a - 1|\) is a multiple of 4. So \(a = 1, 5, 9\). {1, 5, 9}.
(ii) The identity relation. Reflexive: \(a = a\). Symmetric: \(a = b \Rightarrow b = a\). Transitive: \(a = b\) and \(b = c \Rightarrow a = c\).
Set of elements related to 1: only \(a = 1\). {1}.
(i) Symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.
(ii) Transitive but neither reflexive nor symmetric.
(iii) Reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
(iv) Reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
(v) Symmetric and transitive but not reflexive.
(i) R = {(1, 2), (2, 1)}. Symmetric: yes. Not reflexive: (1,1) \(\notin\) R. Not transitive: (1,2) and (2,1) \(\in\) R but (1,1) \(\notin\) R.
(ii) R = {(1, 2)}. Transitive: vacuously true (no chain to check). Not reflexive: (1,1) \(\notin\) R. Not symmetric: (1,2) \(\in\) R but (2,1) \(\notin\) R.
(iii) R = {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,1),(2,3),(3,2)}. Reflexive: yes. Symmetric: yes. Not transitive: (1,2) and (2,3) \(\in\) R but (1,3) \(\notin\) R.
(iv) R = {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2)}. Reflexive and transitive: yes. Not symmetric: (1,2) \(\in\) R but (2,1) \(\notin\) R.
(v) R = {(1,1),(1,2),(2,1),(2,2)}. Symmetric: yes. Transitive: yes. Not reflexive: (3,3) \(\notin\) R.
Symmetric: If dist(P, O) = dist(Q, O), then dist(Q, O) = dist(P, O). So (P, Q) \(\in\) R \(\Rightarrow\) (Q, P) \(\in\) R.
Transitive: If dist(P, O) = dist(Q, O) and dist(Q, O) = dist(R, O), then dist(P, O) = dist(R, O).
The set of all points related to P = {Q : dist(Q, O) = dist(P, O)} = all points at distance \(r = \sqrt{x_P^2 + y_P^2}\) from origin = the circle through P with centre at origin.
Hence R is an equivalence relation.
T₁ has sides 3, 4, 5. T₃ has sides 6, 8, 10 = 2(3, 4, 5). So T₁ ~ T₃.
T₂ has sides 5, 12, 13 which are not proportional to 3, 4, 5.
T₁ and T₃ are related. T₂ is not related to T₁ or T₃.
Symmetric: If P₁ has the same number of sides as P₂, then P₂ has the same as P₁.
Transitive: obvious chain of equalities.
Hence R is an equivalence relation.
The triangle T has 3 sides. All elements related to T = the set of all triangles in A.
R is an equivalence relation.
Lines related to y = 2x + 4: all lines with slope 2, i.e., the set {y = 2x + c : c ∈ R}.
(A) R is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
(B) R is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
(C) R is symmetric and transitive but not reflexive.
(D) R is an equivalence relation.
Symmetric: (1,2) \(\in\) R but (2,1) \(\notin\) R. Not symmetric.
Transitive: (1,3) \(\in\) R, (3,2) \(\in\) R, (1,2) \(\in\) R. Check all chains — none violate transitivity.
Answer: (B) Reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
(A) (2, 4) ∈ R (B) (3, 8) ∈ R (C) (6, 8) ∈ R (D) (8, 7) ∈ R
(A) (2, 4): b = 4, not > 6. No.
(B) (3, 8): a = 3, b = 8 > 6, but 8 − 2 = 6 ≠ 3. No.
(C) (6, 8): a = 6, b = 8 > 6, and 8 − 2 = 6 = a. Yes!
(D) (8, 7): a = 8, b = 7, 7 − 2 = 5 ≠ 8. No.
Answer: (C)
Competency-Based Questions
(a) (7, 4) (b) (5, 9) (c) (12, 8) (d) (15, 6)
(a) 7 − 4 = 3, divisible by 3. Yes.
(b) 5 − 9 = −4, not divisible by 3. No.
(c) 12 − 8 = 4, not divisible by 3. No.
(d) 15 − 6 = 9, divisible by 3. Yes.
Symmetric: If 3 divides \(a - b\), then 3 divides \(-(a-b) = b - a\). So \((a, b) \in R \Rightarrow (b, a) \in R\).
Transitive: If 3 divides \(a - b\) and 3 divides \(b - c\), then 3 divides \((a - b) + (b - c) = a - c\).
Hence R is an equivalence relation.
= {2, 5, 8, −1, −4}.
So [2] within the given set = {−4, −1, 2, 5, 8}.
R is symmetric: (1,2) and (2,1) both present. R is transitive: all chains close.
But R is not reflexive because (3, 3) ∉ R. Element 3 is not related to any element, so we cannot use symmetry and transitivity to derive (3, 3).
Assertion–Reason Questions
Reason (R): A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive is an equivalence relation.
Reason (R): An equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Reason (R): Symmetric and transitive properties are satisfied vacuously when no pairs exist in R.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a reflexive relation?
A relation R in a set A is reflexive if every element is related to itself, i.e., (a, a) belongs to R for every a in A.
What is an equivalence relation?
A relation R in a set A is an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive simultaneously.
What is the difference between empty and universal relations?
An empty relation has no ordered pairs, while a universal relation contains all possible ordered pairs. Both are trivial relations.
How to check if a relation is an equivalence relation?
Verify three properties: reflexive (a,a) in R for all a; symmetric if (a,b) implies (b,a); transitive if (a,b) and (b,c) imply (a,c). All three must hold.
What are equivalence classes?
An equivalence class of element a under equivalence relation R is the set of all elements related to a. Equivalence classes partition the set into non-overlapping subsets.
Frequently Asked Questions — Relations and Functions
What is Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence in NCERT Class 12 Mathematics?
Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence is a key concept covered in NCERT Class 12 Mathematics, Chapter 1: Relations and Functions. This lesson builds the student's foundation in the chapter by explaining the core ideas with worked examples, definitions, and step-by-step methods aligned to the CBSE curriculum.
How do I solve problems on Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence step by step?
To solve problems on Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence, follow the NCERT method: identify the given quantities, choose the relevant formula or theorem, substitute values carefully, and simplify. Class 12 exercises gradually increase in difficulty — start with solved NCERT examples before attempting exercise questions, and always verify your answer by substitution or diagram.
What are the most important formulas for Chapter 1: Relations and Functions?
The essential formulas of Chapter 1 (Relations and Functions) are listed in the chapter summary and highlighted throughout the lesson in formula boxes. Memorise them and practise at least 2–3 problems per formula. CBSE board exams frequently test direct application as well as combined use of multiple formulas from this chapter.
Is Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence important for the Class 12 board exam?
Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence is part of the NCERT Class 12 Mathematics syllabus and appears in CBSE board exams. Questions typically include short-answer, long-answer, and competency-based items. Review the NCERT examples, exercise questions, and previous-year board problems on this topic to prepare confidently.
What mistakes should students avoid in Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence?
Common mistakes in Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence include skipping steps, misapplying formulas, sign errors, and losing track of units. Write each step clearly, double-check algebraic manipulations, and re-read the question after solving to verify that your answer matches what was asked.
Where can I find more NCERT practice questions on Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence?
End-of-chapter NCERT exercises for Types of Relations - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Equivalence cover all difficulty levels tested in CBSE exams. After completing them, try the examples again without looking at the solutions, attempt the NCERT Exemplar questions for Chapter 1, and solve at least one previous-year board paper to consolidate your understanding.