A social division based on shared culture, where people believe in their common descent due to similarities in physical type or cultural practices.
Majoritarianism
A belief that the majority community should rule in whichever way it wants, disregarding minority wishes and needs.
Civil War
A violent conflict between opposing groups within a country that becomes so intense it appears like a full-scale war.
Prudential
Based on careful calculation of practical gains and losses; contrasted with decisions based purely on moral principles.
NCERT Textbook Exercises for Power Sharing Chapter 1
1
What are the different forms of power sharing in modern democracies? Give an example of each of these.
L3 Apply
Answer: There are four major forms of power sharing in modern democracies:
(i) Horizontal distribution — among organs of government: Power is shared among the legislature, executive, and judiciary at the same level. Each organ checks the others. Example: In India, the Supreme Court can declare a law passed by Parliament as unconstitutional.
(ii) Vertical distribution — among levels of government: Power is shared between the central government and state/provincial governments, and further down to local bodies. Example: In India, the Union Government handles defence and foreign affairs, while State Governments manage police and public health. Panchayats and municipalities handle local issues.
(iii) Among social groups: Power is shared among different religious, linguistic, or ethnic communities. Example: Belgium's community government system gives each language community (Dutch, French, German) authority over its own cultural and educational affairs.
(iv) Among political parties and pressure groups: Competition among parties ensures power rotates. Example: Coalition governments, such as Germany's 2005 grand coalition between the CDU and SPD, represent power-sharing between rival parties. Trade unions and business associations also influence governmental decisions.
2
State one prudential reason and one moral reason for power sharing with an example from the Indian context.
L4 Analyse
Answer:
Prudential reason: Power sharing helps reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups, thereby ensuring political stability. Indian example: India's federal system divides power between the Union and State Governments. States like Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and the North-Eastern states have significant autonomy over local matters. This has helped accommodate regional aspirations and prevented large-scale separatist conflicts that might otherwise have occurred in such a diverse country.
Moral reason: Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy. People have a right to be consulted on how they are governed. A legitimate government is one in which citizens acquire a stake through participation. Indian example: The system of reserved constituencies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in Parliament and state legislatures ensures that historically marginalised communities have a voice in law-making. This upholds the democratic principle that all groups affected by government decisions should have a say in the process.
3
After reading this chapter, three students drew different conclusions. Which of these do you agree with and why? Give your reasons in about 50 words.
L5 Evaluate
Thomman: Power sharing is necessary only in societies which have religious, linguistic or ethnic divisions.
Mathayi: Power sharing is suitable only for big countries that have regional divisions.
Ouseph: Every society needs some form of power sharing even if it is small or does not have social divisions.
Answer: Ouseph's conclusion is the most accurate. Power sharing is not only needed in diverse or large societies — it is a fundamental principle of democracy itself. Even in small or relatively homogeneous societies, power must be shared among different organs of government (legislature, executive, judiciary) and among political parties and pressure groups. This prevents the concentration of authority, ensures checks and balances, and upholds citizens' right to participate in governance. Thomman and Mathayi's views are too narrow because they limit power sharing to only one of its four forms.
4
The Mayor of Merchtem, a town near Brussels in Belgium, has defended a ban on speaking French in the town's schools. He said that the ban would help all non-Dutch speakers integrate in this Flemish town. Do you think that this measure is in keeping with the spirit of Belgium's power sharing arrangements? Give your reasons in about 50 words.
L5 Evaluate
Answer: No, this measure goes against the spirit of Belgium's power-sharing arrangements. The Belgian model was built on the principle that both linguistic communities should be respected and accommodated. Banning French in schools contradicts the community government system, which allows each language group to manage its own educational affairs. While integration is a valid goal, it should not come at the cost of suppressing another community's language rights. The Belgian constitution was specifically designed to prevent any one community from imposing its will unilaterally.
5
Read the following passage and pick out any one of the prudential reasons for power sharing offered in this.
L4 Analyse
Passage
"We need to give more power to the panchayats to realise the dream of Mahatma Gandhi and the hopes of the makers of our Constitution. Panchayati Raj establishes true democracy. It restores power to the only place where power belongs in a democracy — in the hands of the people. Giving power to Panchayats is also a way to reduce corruption and increase administrative efficiency. When people participate in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, they would naturally exercise greater control over these schemes. This would eliminate the corrupt middlemen. Thus, Panchayati Raj will strengthen the foundations of our democracy."
Answer: The passage contains several prudential reasons. One key prudential reason is: Giving power to Panchayats helps reduce corruption and increase administrative efficiency. This is a prudential argument because it focuses on practical benefits — better outcomes through decentralised governance. When people participate directly in planning and implementing development schemes, they exercise greater control, which eliminates corrupt middlemen. This is a gain-based argument (better governance outcomes) rather than a moral argument about the right to participate.
6
Different arguments are usually put forth in favour of and against power sharing. Identify those which are in favour of power sharing and select the answer using the codes given below.
L4 Analyse
A. Reduces conflict among different communities
B. Decreases the possibility of arbitrariness
C. Delays decision making process
D. Accommodates diversities
E. Increases instability and divisiveness
F. Promotes people's participation in government
G. Undermines the unity of a country
(a) A, B, D, F
(b) A, C, E, F
(c) A, B, D, G
(d) B, C, D, G
Answer: (a) A, B, D, F
Arguments in favour of power sharing: A (reduces conflict), B (decreases arbitrariness), D (accommodates diversities), and F (promotes participation). These reflect both prudential reasons (A, B — better outcomes) and moral reasons (D, F — democratic values).
Arguments C (delays decisions), E (increases instability), and G (undermines unity) are arguments against power sharing — and the chapter shows these arguments are actually incorrect.
7
Consider the following statements about power sharing arrangements in Belgium and Sri Lanka.
L4 Analyse
A. In Belgium, the Dutch-speaking majority people tried to impose their domination on the minority French-speaking community.
B. In Sri Lanka, the policies of the government sought to ensure the dominance of the Sinhala-speaking majority.
C. The Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power sharing to protect their culture, language and equality of opportunity in education and jobs.
D. The transformation of Belgium from unitary government to a federal one prevented a possible division of the country on linguistic lines.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) A, B, C and D
(b) A, B and D
(c) C and D
(d) B, C and D
Answer: (d) B, C and D
Statement A is incorrect — in Belgium, it was not the Dutch-speaking majority that tried to impose domination. Rather, the French-speaking minority was historically richer and more powerful, which caused resentment among the Dutch majority. The Dutch community did not attempt majoritarian domination; instead, Belgium resolved tensions through accommodation.
Statements B, C, and D are all correct: the Sri Lankan government did pursue Sinhala dominance (B), Tamil groups did demand federal arrangements (C), and Belgium's shift from unitary to federal governance prevented division (D).
8
Match List I (forms of power sharing) with List II (forms of government) and select the correct answer.
L3 Apply
List I
List II
1.
Power shared among different organs of government
A. Community government
2.
Power shared among governments at different levels
B. Separation of powers
3.
Power shared by different social groups
C. Coalition government
4.
Power shared by two or more political parties
D. Federal government
(a) 1-D, 2-A, 3-B, 4-C
(b) 1-B, 2-C, 3-D, 4-A
(c) 1-B, 2-D, 3-A, 4-C
(d) 1-C, 2-D, 3-A, 4-B
Answer: (c) 1-B, 2-D, 3-A, 4-C
1 → B (Separation of powers): Sharing power among legislature, executive, and judiciary is called separation of powers. 2 → D (Federal government): Sharing power among central and state/provincial governments is federalism. 3 → A (Community government): Sharing power among social groups (like Belgium's language communities) creates community governance. 4 → C (Coalition government): When two or more parties share power, it forms a coalition government.
9
Consider the following two statements on power sharing and select the answer using the codes given below:
L4 Analyse
A. Power sharing is good for democracy.
B. It helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.
(a) A is true but B is false
(b) Both A and B are true
(c) Both A and B are false
(d) A is false but B is true
Answer: (b) Both A and B are true
Statement A is true — power sharing is indeed good for democracy because it is the very spirit of democratic governance (moral reason). Statement B is also true — power sharing reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups (prudential reason). Both statements express complementary reasons in favour of power sharing, and both are supported by the evidence from Belgium and Sri Lanka studied in this chapter.
⚖ Additional Assertion-Reason Practice
Assertion (A): Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy. Reason (R): In a democracy, people are the source of all political power and have the right to participate in governance.
(A) Both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A
(B) Both A and R are true, but R does not correctly explain A
(C) A is true but R is false
(D) A is false but R is true
Answer: (A) — Both statements are true. The reason directly explains the assertion: because people are the source of all political power and have the right to participate, power-sharing becomes an essential feature of democracy.
Assertion (A): Belgium's community government has powers over cultural, educational, and language-related matters. Reason (R): The community government in Belgium is a form of vertical division of power between central and state governments.
(A) Both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A
(B) Both A and R are true, but R does not correctly explain A
(C) A is true but R is false
(D) A is false but R is true
Answer: (C) — The assertion is true: the community government does manage cultural, educational, and language matters. However, the reason is false: the community government is not a form of vertical division between central and state governments. It is actually an example of power-sharing among social groups (the third form) — it is elected by language communities regardless of where their members live, making it distinct from the central-state-local hierarchy.
What are the important questions for power sharing Class 10?
Important questions for Power Sharing Class 10 include explaining the ethnic composition of Belgium and Sri Lanka, describing majoritarian and accommodative approaches, listing four forms of power sharing with examples, distinguishing between prudential and moral reasons for power sharing, and analysing why Belgium's approach is considered more successful than Sri Lanka's. Students should also prepare competency-based questions linking power sharing principles to real-world democratic scenarios.
What is the key term majoritarianism in power sharing?
Majoritarianism is a key term in the Power Sharing chapter referring to a belief that the majority community should be able to rule a country in whichever way it wishes by disregarding the wishes and needs of the minority. In Sri Lanka, the Sinhala majority adopted majoritarian policies through language laws, education preferences, and constitutional changes that alienated the Tamil minority. This concept contrasts with the accommodation approach adopted by Belgium.
How many forms of power sharing are there Class 10?
There are four forms of power sharing covered in NCERT Class 10 Civics Chapter 1. These are horizontal power sharing among different organs of government, vertical power sharing among different levels of government, power sharing among different social groups, and power sharing among political parties and pressure groups. Each form helps distribute authority and prevent concentration of power in modern democracies.
What are assertion-reason questions on power sharing?
Assertion-reason questions on power sharing test higher-order thinking by presenting two statements. Students must determine whether both are correct and whether the reason correctly explains the assertion. Common examples include assertions about Belgium's accommodation model with reasons about constitutional provisions, and assertions about Sri Lanka's civil war with reasons about majoritarian policies. The standard format uses four options covering all combinations of true/false for assertion and reason.
What is the summary of Power Sharing Chapter 1 Class 10?
Power Sharing, Chapter 1 of NCERT Class 10 Democratic Politics, compares Belgium and Sri Lanka's approaches to managing ethnic diversity. Belgium, with Dutch, French, and German speakers, chose accommodation through community governments, equal cabinet representation, and federal restructuring. Sri Lanka's Sinhala majority adopted majoritarianism through the 1956 Act, leading to civil war. The chapter establishes that power sharing is both prudentially wise and morally correct, and identifies four forms of power sharing in modern democracies.
Social Science Class 10 — Democratic Politics II (Civics)
Ready
🤖
Hi! 👋 I'm Gaura, your AI Tutor for Exercises — Power Sharing. Take your time studying the lesson — whenever you have a doubt, just ask me! I'm here to help.