This MCQ module is based on: Self-Employed, Casual, Regular & Informalisation
Self-Employed, Casual, Regular & Informalisation
This assessment will be based on: Self-Employed, Casual, Regular & Informalisation
Upload images, PDFs, or Word documents to include their content in assessment generation.
6.5 Self-Employed, Casual Wage and Regular Salaried Workers
The Worker-Population Ratio tells us how many people work. To learn about the quality of work, NCERT asks us to look at the status with which a worker is placed inside an enterprise. Status reveals the worker's attachment to the job, the authority she has over the work, and her relationship with co-workers.
NCERT illustrates this with three workers from the construction industry — a cement-shop owner, a construction worker, and a civil engineer employed by a construction company. All three contribute to building houses and roads, yet each holds a very different position in the labour market.
Distribution Across Gender — Chart 6.1
NCERT's Chart 6.1 (Distribution of Employment by Gender) shows that self-employment is a major source of livelihood for both men and women, accounting for more than 50 per cent in each category. For male workers, the split is approximately 54% self-employed, 25% regular salaried and 21% casual. For female workers, the split is far more skewed: about 67% self-employed, 16% regular salaried and 17% casual. Casual wage work is the second-largest category for women — a worrying sign of low job quality.
When it comes to regular salaried jobs, men dominate at about 21 per cent against 16 per cent for women — a gap that NCERT calls "less" but persistent. This means that even when women do work outside the home, they are less likely to find permanent, secure jobs.
Distribution Across Region — Chart 6.2
NCERT's Chart 6.2 (Distribution of Employment by Region) breaks the same numbers between rural and urban India. The contrast is stark: self-employed workers are far more concentrated in rural areas (~65%) than in urban areas (~40%), because most rural households own small plots of land and cultivate independently. In urban areas, both regular wage employment and casual labour are larger because cities house factories, shops and offices that need regular workers.
| Status | Urban Workers | Rural Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Employed | 40 | 65 |
| Regular Salaried Employees | 48 | 13 |
| Casual Wage Labourers | 12 | 22 |
Why this difference? In urban areas, factories, shops and offices need workers on a regular basis. In rural areas, the majority depends on farming on owned land, which is itself a form of self-employment. NCERT also stresses that the most vulnerable group is the casual wage labourer, exposed to seasonal idleness, accidents and abrupt job loss.
NCERT asks: mark (a) self-employed, (b) regular salaried employee or (c) casual wage labourer against each of the eight workers given below.
- 1. Owner of a saloon — (a) self-employed.
- 2. Worker in a rice mill paid daily but employed regularly — (b) regular salaried (employed regularly even though wage is daily).
- 3. Cashier in State Bank of India — (b) regular salaried.
- 4. Typist in a state-government office on daily wage but paid monthly — (b) regular salaried.
- 5. A handloom weaver — (a) self-employed.
- 6. Loading worker in a wholesale vegetable shop — (c) casual wage labourer.
- 7. Owner of a cold-drinks shop — (a) self-employed.
- 8. Nurse in a private hospital with monthly salary, working for 5 years — (b) regular salaried.
6.6 Distribution of Workers by Industry — Primary, Secondary, Tertiary
In the course of economic development, labour flows away from agriculture into industry and services. Workers migrate from villages to cities, and at a much later stage even the industrial sector loses share as the service sector enters a period of rapid expansion. NCERT divides all economic activity into eight industrial divisions, then groups them into three sectors:
| Industrial Category | Rural | Urban | Men | Women | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Sector | 59.8 | 6.7 | 36.3 | 64.4 | 46.1 |
| Secondary Sector | 21.4 | 32.4 | 28.8 | 15.6 | 24.1 |
| Tertiary / Service Sector | 18.8 | 60.9 | 34.9 | 20.0 | 29.8 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
The table teaches us four lessons. First, the primary sector remains the main employer of Indians at 46 per cent. Second, the secondary sector employs only about 24 per cent, far less than what was hoped for after seven decades of planning. Third, the service sector employs about 30 per cent, and is rising fastest. Fourth, gender concentration is sharply different — about 64 per cent of women workers are stuck in the primary sector, while only 36 per cent of men are. Men have escaped into secondary and tertiary work; women have not, mainly due to lower mobility and skill access.
In rural India, about 60 per cent of workers depend on agriculture, forestry and fishing; about 21 per cent are in manufacturing/construction/other industry; and about 19 per cent in services. In urban India, agriculture is a tiny employer — about 61 per cent of urban workers are in services, and another third in industry.
6.7 Growth and Changing Structure of Employment — Jobless Growth, Casualisation
NCERT now compares two indicators side-by-side: growth of GDP and growth of employment. The expectation is straightforward — when GDP rises, jobs should rise alongside. But what really happened in India during 1950–2010?
During the period 1950–2010, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of India grew positively and was higher than the employment growth, although there was always fluctuation in the growth of GDP. During this period, employment grew at the rate of not more than 2 per cent. Maintaining even 2 per cent employment growth in a country as large as India is itself a feat — but the gap between GDP growth and employment growth has steadily widened.
Trends in Employment Pattern — Table 6.3
NCERT records two parallel trends — sectoral movement and status movement — over five decades.
| Item | 1972-73 | 1983 | 1993-94 | 2011-12 | 2017-18 | 2023-24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sector | ||||||
| Primary | 74.3 | 68.6 | 64 | 48.9 | 46.1 | 46.1 |
| Secondary | 10.9 | 11.5 | 16 | 24.3 | 24.9 | 24.1 |
| Services | 14.8 | 16.9 | 20 | 26.8 | 29.0 | 29.8 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Status | ||||||
| Self-Employed | 61.4 | 57.3 | 54.6 | 52.0 | 55.6 | 58.4 |
| Regular Salaried | 15.4 | 13.8 | 13.6 | 18.0 | 21.1 | 21.7 |
| Casual Wage | 23.2 | 28.9 | 31.8 | 30.0 | 23.3 | 19.9 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Reading the sector rows: in 1972-73, about 74 per cent of the workforce was in the primary sector; by 2023-24, this share has fallen to about 46 per cent. The secondary sector has risen from 11 to 24 per cent, and services from 15 to 30 per cent. NCERT calls this structural change? — a healthy sign of development.
But the status rows tell a more troubling story. Over the five decades from 1972 to 2017, India saw a movement away from self-employment and regular salaried jobs into casual wage work. NCERT calls this process casualisation?. It makes workers highly vulnerable. Looking at the most recent column, however, NCERT highlights a moderate rise in regular salaried employment — from 18 per cent in 2011-12 to 21.7 per cent in 2023-24 — possibly reflecting service-sector formalisation and digitisation of payrolls.
NCERT raises three reflective questions: (i) is 2-per-cent employment growth easy for India? (ii) what happens if no extra jobs are created even though output rises? (iii) if a regular pharma worker becomes a daily-wage labourer at higher pay, is that good?
- 2% growth is hard: India's labour force itself grows by ~1.5–2% a year; just keeping the unemployment rate steady requires creating roughly that many jobs every year — millions of new jobs annually.
- Jobless growth implications: output rises but new entrants (especially youth) cannot find work; income inequality widens; demand falters because wage-earners are too few; political and social stress grows.
- Marginal farmer turning into agricultural labourer: short-term cash gain may come at the cost of identity, social standing and long-term security — daily wages disappear in lean seasons, and the worker loses any "asset" base.
- Pharma worker turning casual: earnings may rise temporarily but provident fund, gratuity, paid leave and healthcare all vanish; one accident or one illness can wipe out years of savings — so casualisation is rarely welcome despite higher cash wages.
6.8 Informalisation of the Indian Workforce
NCERT picks up the formal-informal split from the previous section and asks the harder follow-up: even after 70 years of planning, why has India failed to formalise its workforce?
One of the objectives of development planning since Independence has been to provide a decent livelihood to its people. Industrialisation was expected to absorb surplus farm workers into factories with rising standards of living, as in developed countries. Yet more than half of Indian workers still depend on farming. Economists argue that the quality of employment has actually been deteriorating — even after working for 10–20 years, many workers do not get maternity benefit, provident fund, gratuity or pension. A private-sector worker often earns less than a public-sector worker doing the very same job.
Where gender data is available — for 2011–12 — about 20 per cent of formal-sector workers and 30 per cent of informal-sector workers were women. Women therefore bear a disproportionate share of insecure work.
Box 6.2 — Informalisation in Ahmedabad
Source: Renana Jhabvala, Ratna M. Sudarshan and Jeemol Unni (Ed.), Informal Economy at Centre Stage, Sage, 2003.
Since the late 1970s, many developing countries (including India) have started paying attention to enterprises and workers in the informal sector, because employment in the formal sector is not growing. Workers and enterprises in the informal sector face four chronic problems:
Of late, owing to the efforts of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), the Indian government has initiated the modernisation of informal sector enterprises and the provision of social security measures to informal sector workers — schemes like e-Shram registration, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima, Atal Pension Yojana and PM-SYM are part of this push.
NCERT asks: how do you understand the stagnation of the secondary sector and the moderate rise in self-employment during 2011–24? Also — why did regular salaried jobs rise moderately in 2017–24?
- Stagnation of secondary sector: manufacturing growth has been below the planned target of 25% of GDP; capital-intensive technology has displaced labour; small & medium enterprises faced shocks (demonetisation, GST transition, Covid-19); imports of cheap Chinese goods have hurt domestic producers.
- Rise in self-employment: distress-driven (workers expelled from manufacturing return to family farms or open kirana shops/auto-rickshaws); platform-based gig work (Ola, Uber, Zomato) is technically self-employment.
- Rise in regular salaried jobs (2017–24): formalisation drives like EPFO/ESIC enforcement, GST registrations, PLFS reclassification of long-employed workers, and growth of organised retail, IT/BPO and platform delivery firms with payroll.
- Mixed message: the "moderate rise" in regular salaried is welcome but masks rising informal self-employment alongside.
📝 Competency-Based Questions — Status, Sectors & Informalisation
Options: (A) Both A & R true, R correctly explains A · (B) Both true, R does not explain A · (C) A true, R false · (D) A false, R true.