TOPIC 19 OF 21

Globalisation — Concept, Causes & Political Consequences

🎓 Class 12 Social Science CBSE Theory Chapter 7 — Globalisation ⏱ ~25 min
🌐 Language: [gtranslate]

This MCQ module is based on: Globalisation — Concept, Causes & Political Consequences

This assessment will be based on: Globalisation — Concept, Causes & Political Consequences

Upload images, PDFs, or Word documents to include their content in assessment generation.

Class 12 · Political Science · Contemporary World Politics · FINAL CHAPTER

Chapter 7 · Globalisation — Part 1: The Concept, Causes & Political Consequences

When Janardhan in Bengaluru becomes "John" at midnight to take customer-service calls from Boston — and his daughter sleeps in a bed assembled from a Chinese cycle, an American doll and an Indian dream — he is living what world politics calls globalisation. This Part begins with the famous NCERT call-centre case, asks what globalisation actually is (a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving flows of ideas, capital, commodities and people), traces its causes from telegraph and microchip to MNCs and the post-1991 neoliberal order, and ends with the contested political consequences for state sovereignty — does globalisation weaken the state, or does it sometimes make the state stronger?

7.1 The Concept of Globalisation — Janardhan's Story

Open the international page of any Indian newspaper printed in the last twenty years and the word globalisation appears in story after story — about call centres, free-trade agreements, foreign investment, K-pop concerts, Hollywood remakes, McDonald's outlets, and migrant nurses. To many, the word feels like a slogan. But behind the slogan lies a precise idea worth understanding. NCERT begins this chapter — the final chapter of Contemporary World Politics — with three small stories from ordinary Indian lives. Each illustrates a different face of the same phenomenon.

📞 NCERT Case Study · Janardhan

"At night I become John"

Janardhan works in a call centre?. He leaves home late in the evening for office, where he becomes John the moment he enters — adopting a new accent, a new way of speaking, even a new name, so that his customers thousands of kilometres away in the United States find him "natural" to talk to. He works through the night, because his night is the American daytime. His holidays follow the American calendar, not the Indian one. He renders a service — patiently, professionally — to people he will probably never meet face to face.

Ramdhari, meanwhile, has gone shopping for his daughter's ninth birthday. He buys her a small cycle that turns out to have been manufactured in China but sold in India. Last year he had bought her a Barbie doll made in the USA. Sarika, a first-generation learner, has just been offered a job that the women in her family had never imagined possible — though some of her relatives oppose it, she takes it because new opportunities have opened up for her generation.

Each story is a fragment of globalisation. Janardhan's call-centre work is the globalisation of services. Ramdhari's birthday shopping is the movement of commodities from one part of the world to another. Sarika's job offer is part of the wider shift in values that globalisation brings — new opportunities, new conflicts, new identities.

But NCERT also gives the other side. A farmer commits suicide because expensive seeds supplied by a multinational company failed to germinate. An Indian company buys out a major rival in Europe over the protests of its current owners. Small retail shopkeepers fear that their livelihood will collapse if international retail chains arrive. A Mumbai film producer is accused of lifting the story of his film from a Hollywood movie. A militant group threatens college girls who wear "western" clothes. Globalisation, NCERT warns, is not always positive. It can have negative consequences. It is not only about economic issues. And the direction of influence is not always from the rich to the poor.

7.1.1 What, Then, Is Globalisation? — A Concept of Flows

Because the word is used so loosely, it is important to clarify what it actually means. As a concept, globalisation fundamentally deals with flows. These flows can be of many kinds — and the chapter lists four. Together, they create what NCERT calls "worldwide interconnectedness" — and that interconnectedness, sustained by these constant flows, is the heart of globalisation.

Globalisation = Flows + Interconnectedness — The Four Streams
Worldwide Interconnectedness 💡 IDEAS internet, films, music, beliefs 💰 CAPITAL FDI, FII, loans, banks 📦 COMMODITIES goods, services, raw material 🚶 PEOPLE migrants, students, workers, tourists All four flows together create the worldwide interconnectedness called globalisation
💡
Ideas
Knowledge, beliefs, culture, technology — moving from one part of the world to another via internet, books, films, music.
💰
Capital
Money shunted between two or more places — investments, loans, bank transfers, foreign direct investment, portfolio flows.
📦
Commodities
Goods, raw materials and services traded across borders — Chinese cycles, Indian software, Japanese cars, Saudi crude.
🚶
People
Migrants seeking better livelihoods, students chasing degrees abroad, tourists, refugees and skilled workers crossing borders.
📖 Definition — Globalisation
Globalisation? is a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving the flows of ideas, capital, commodities and people across borders, sustaining a worldwide interconnectedness. It is not the same as westernisation or Americanisation. It has political, economic and cultural dimensions, and its impact is unequal — it affects some societies more than others, and some parts of some societies more than others.

7.1.2 Globalisation Is Multi-Dimensional — Not Just Economics

It is wrong to assume that globalisation has purely economic dimensions, just as it would also be mistaken to assume that it is a purely cultural phenomenon. Globalisation is a multi-dimensional concept — political, economic and cultural — and these manifestations must be carefully distinguished. The impact of globalisation is also vastly uneven. It affects some societies more than others, and some parts of some societies more than others. We must avoid sweeping generalisations and pay attention to specific contexts.

Globalisation also involves what scholars call de-territorialisation? — the loosening of the connection between social activity and a fixed geographical place. A call from a customer in Texas can be answered in Bengaluru; a film script for a Mumbai studio can be co-written in Los Angeles; a financial decision taken in New York can move stock prices in Mumbai within seconds. Linked to this is time–space compression? — the world feels smaller and faster, because new technologies have shrunk the time it takes for ideas, capital, goods and people to travel across distance.

Three Dimensions of Globalisation — A Triangle, Not a Single Line
POLITICAL sovereignty governance ECONOMIC trade · capital labour · MNCs CULTURAL homogenisation heterogenisation Globalisation all three dimensions interact — never reduce it to one alone
🌐 Margin Question — "Isn't globalisation a new name for imperialism?"
An NCERT margin question asks whether globalisation is just a new word for old imperialism?. The two are not identical. Old imperialism rested on direct political control by European empires. Modern globalisation operates more through flows — markets, technology, finance, ideas — than through gunboats and governors. But critics argue that powerful states and firms still set the rules of the game, so the line between "globalisation" and "neo-imperialism" is debated.

7.2 Causes of Globalisation

What accounts for globalisation? If globalisation is about the flows of ideas, capital, commodities, and people, it is logical to ask whether there is anything new about this phenomenon. After all, flows of all four kinds have taken place through much of human history.

7.2.1 Globalisation Has a Long History — But Today's Scale and Speed Are New

Long before steamships and the internet, ideas, goods and people moved across continents. The Silk Road connected China through Central Asia to West Asia and the Mediterranean for over a thousand years. The Indian Ocean trade network linked Indian ports to East Africa, Arabia, and Southeast Asia for centuries. European colonialism from the sixteenth century onwards created the first truly global economy — but at a brutal cost to the colonies. Those who argue that contemporary globalisation is genuinely new point not to the existence of these flows but to their scale and speed. A song uploaded to the internet today reaches every corner of the planet within hours. A currency crisis in Bangkok in 1997 shook stock markets in Mumbai and São Paulo within days.

Historical Antecedents — Globalisation Is Not Brand New
EraWhat FlowedWhy It Mattered
Silk Road (200 BCE–1500 CE)Silk, spices, ideas, religionConnected China, India, Persia and Rome through overland trade — the first long-distance commercial network.
Indian Ocean trade (1st millennium onwards)Spices, cotton, gems, gold, ideas, religionsLinked South Asia to Arabia, East Africa, Southeast Asia. Indian merchants and sailors were central nodes.
Colonialism (1500–1947)Raw materials out · finished goods in · enslaved & bonded labourCreated the first integrated world economy — but on terms set by European empires, ruinous for colonies.
Post-1945 (Bretton Woods era)Aid, trade, capital — under US-led orderIMF, World Bank, GATT created rules for an integrated capitalist world economy after WWII.
Post-1991 (Neoliberal globalisation)FDI, services, internet, MNCs at unprecedented scaleEnd of Cold War + WTO 1995 + internet revolution → contemporary globalisation.

7.2.2 Technology — The Critical Engine

While globalisation is not caused by any single factor, technology remains a critical element. There is no doubt that the invention of the telegraph, the telephone, and the microchip in more recent times has revolutionised communication between different parts of the world. When printing initially came into being it laid the basis for the creation of nationalism; today, similarly, we should expect that technology will affect the way we think of our personal but also our collective lives.

The ability of ideas, capital, commodities and people to move more easily from one part of the world to another has been made possible largely by technological advances. The pace of these flows may vary. The movement of capital and commodities is most likely to be quicker and wider than the movement of people across different parts of the world.

📡
Telecommunications
Telephone, satellite phones and now mobile networks make voice contact across the world cheap and instant.
🌐
Internet & Fibre Optics
Digital data — emails, video calls, transactions, cloud computing — flows across continents in milliseconds via undersea fibre cables.
✈️
Jet Aviation
Cheap, fast, long-haul flights have made global tourism, business travel and migration possible at scale.
🛰️
Satellites
TV broadcasting, GPS navigation and global communications all rely on the satellite network — the invisible backbone of globalisation.
💾
Microprocessors
The microchip — invented in the late 20th century — made cheap powerful computers possible, and with them the entire digital economy.
🌐 Bird Flu, Tsunami, Pandemic — Why Recognition Matters
Globalisation does not emerge merely because of better communications. What is important is for people in different parts of the world to recognise these interconnections with the rest of the world. We are now aware that a virus that begins in one continent can reach another in days; that a tsunami in the Indian Ocean can grieve homes from Aceh to Tamil Nadu to Somalia; that a financial shock in New York can move every stock exchange in the world. Disease, disaster and finance — all three demonstrate that some events do not respect national boundaries.

7.2.3 The End of the Cold War & the Neoliberal Turn (1991)

A second great cause of contemporary globalisation was the end of the Cold War in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The disappearance of the socialist bloc removed the main alternative to free-market capitalism. Across the world, including in India, governments adopted neoliberal reforms — reducing the role of the state, opening up to foreign capital, privatising public-sector enterprises, deregulating finance. India's own famous 1991 LPG reforms — Liberalisation, Privatisation, Globalisation, under Finance Minister Manmohan Singh — were part of this global turn.

7.2.4 International Institutions & the Multinational Corporation

The post-1945 order had already created institutions that would, after 1991, accelerate globalisation. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) — which became the World Trade Organization (WTO)? in 1995 — set rules to lower trade barriers and move capital across borders.

Even more important, however, was the rise of the multinational corporation (MNC)?. By 2023 there were roughly 80,000 MNCs operating worldwide, with around 840,000 affiliates spread across countries. Companies like Coca-Cola, Walmart, Toyota, Apple, Tata, Reliance, Samsung and Aramco produce, sell and source across continents. They organise global supply chains in which a single phone may be designed in California, programmed in Bengaluru, contain chips from Taiwan and Korea, and be assembled in Shenzhen for sale in Mumbai.

MNCs & Their Affiliates — A Half-Century of Explosive Growth
No. of MNCs Year 0 20k 40k 80k 1970 ~7k 1990 ~37k 2000 ~63k 2010 ~78k 2020 ~80k 2024 ~80k+ ~80,000 MNCs & ~840,000 affiliates worldwide (2023)

Approximate counts of multinational parent firms — UNCTAD & OECD data, rounded.

7.3 Political Consequences — Globalisation and the State

One of the most fiercely debated questions raised by contemporary globalisation is its political impact. How does globalisation affect traditional conceptions of state sovereignty?? NCERT identifies three aspects we need to consider when answering this question. They do not pull in the same direction — globalisation pushes states in different ways at the same time.

7.3.1 First — Erosion of State Capacity (the Welfare State Shrinks)

At the most simple level, globalisation results in an erosion of state capacity — that is, the ability of governments to do what they used to do. All over the world, the old welfare state? is now giving way to a more minimalist state that performs only certain core functions — maintenance of law and order, security of citizens, protection of borders. The state withdraws from many of its earlier welfare functions directed at economic and social well-being. In place of the welfare state, it is the market that becomes the prime determinant of economic and social priorities.

The entry and the increased role of multinational companies all over the world also reduces the capacity of governments to take decisions on their own. A state that wants to tax foreign investors heavily, or impose strict labour laws, may discover that the investors simply move elsewhere. The threat of capital flight disciplines policy. To stay attractive, governments compete in cutting taxes and regulations — what critics call a "race to the bottom".

7.3.2 Second — But the State Continues to Be Important

At the same time, globalisation does not always reduce state capacity. The primacy of the state continues to be the unchallenged basis of political community. The old jealousies and rivalries between countries have not ceased to matter in world politics. The state continues to discharge its essential functions — law and order, national security — and consciously withdraws from certain domains by choice. States continue to be important.

7.3.3 Third — In Some Ways, the State Becomes Stronger

Indeed, in some respects state capacity has actually received a boost as a consequence of globalisation. With enhanced technologies available — biometric IDs, surveillance cameras, mass digital databases, satellite imagery — the state is better able to collect information about its citizens. With this information, the state is better able to rule, not less able. Aadhaar, GST, digital tax records, CCTV networks, drone surveillance, big data analytics — all give the modern state powers no welfare state of the 1950s ever had. Thus, NCERT concludes, in some ways states become more powerful than they were earlier as an outcome of the new technology.

⚠ The Three Faces of the State Under Globalisation
Globalisation pulls the modern state in three opposite directions at once: (1) it shrinks the welfare state and weakens economic decision-making; (2) it preserves the state's essential security and law-and-order functions; (3) it actually strengthens the state's surveillance and information-gathering capacity. The state is not simply withering away — it is being re-shaped.

7.3.4 New Global Governance — Beyond the Nation-State

Globalisation has also produced new forms of global governance — institutions and rules that operate above the nation-state. The WTO sets rules for international trade that bind member states. The IMF imposes conditions on countries that borrow from it. Multilateral environmental treaties (UNFCCC, Paris Agreement) commit countries to emission targets. Regional bodies — EU, ASEAN, SAARC — pool some sovereignty for shared decision-making. The state is no longer the only player on the political field.

EXPLORE — Collect Newspaper Clippings on Globalisation for One Week
Bloom: L3 Apply

NCERT itself asks: "Go through newspapers for a week and collect clippings on anything related to globalisation." Spend seven days scanning your daily newspaper. Cut, photograph or screenshot at least ten news items related to globalisation — from any of its three dimensions (political, economic, cultural).

  1. For each clipping, label it: political, economic, or cultural globalisation.
  2. Mark whether the news is positive (new opportunities, jobs, lower prices) or negative (job loss, cultural threat, sovereignty concern).
  3. Note which of the four flows it relates to — ideas, capital, commodities, or people.
  4. Bring the file to class for a 5-minute presentation.
✅ Pointers
Most newspapers will give you stories on Indian companies investing abroad (Tata, Reliance, Adani buying foreign firms — capital flow), foreign companies entering India (Apple, Tesla, McDonald's — commodities and capital), Indian students going abroad (people flow), Bollywood films released globally or Hollywood remakes filmed in India (cultural flows), WTO disputes, currency moves, sanctions and tariff wars (political dimension). The point is that on any single day, all three dimensions of globalisation are visibly at work in the news.
THINK — Is Janardhan a Beneficiary or a Victim of Globalisation?
Bloom: L4 Analyse

Re-read the call-centre case at the start of this Part. Janardhan has a job he might not otherwise have had. He earns dollars converted into rupees. His daughter studies in a private school. But he is awake all night, sleeps through the day, has lost the rhythm of family life with his parents and neighbours, becomes "John" while at work, and risks burnout.

  1. Make two columns — "Benefits" and "Costs" — for Janardhan.
  2. List at least three points in each column.
  3. Write a 100-word verdict — is he a winner or a loser of globalisation?
✅ Pointers
Benefits: A job that did not exist in India twenty years ago; better-than-average salary; English-language exposure; access to consumer goods. Costs: Disturbed body clock leading to health problems; identity strain ("John" all night); social isolation; service-sector work with limited long-term career growth; vulnerability to outsourcing decisions made far away. Most students conclude that Janardhan is a beneficiary in narrow economic terms but a victim in broader human terms — which is exactly the dual nature of globalisation NCERT is asking us to see.
⚠ Five Numbers to Remember from Section 1
1991 — End of Cold War; India's LPG reforms. 1995 — WTO founded. 4 flows of globalisation — ideas, capital, commodities, people. ~80,000 MNCs and ~840,000 affiliates (2023). 3 dimensions of globalisation — political, economic, cultural — and 3 effects on the state — erosion, continuity, strengthening.
📋

Competency-Based Questions — Part 1

Case Study: Globalisation is a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving flows of ideas, capital, commodities and people that create worldwide interconnectedness. It is not the same as westernisation. Its causes are technological (telegraph, microchip, internet, jet aviation), historical (Silk Road, Indian Ocean trade, colonialism), institutional (IMF, World Bank, WTO 1995, ~80,000 MNCs by 2023), and political (end of Cold War 1991 + neoliberal turn). Its political consequences pull in three directions: erosion of welfare-state capacity, continuity of state importance, and an actual strengthening of state surveillance and information capacity.
Q1. Globalisation, as a concept, fundamentally deals with:
L1 Remember
  • (A) only the movement of capital between rich countries
  • (B) flows of ideas, capital, commodities and people across borders
  • (C) only the spread of American culture worldwide
  • (D) the abolition of nation-states and creation of a single world government
Answer: (B) — Globalisation deals with four kinds of flows — ideas, capital, commodities and people — that together create worldwide interconnectedness. It is multi-dimensional and is not the same as westernisation, Americanisation, or world government.
Q2. Which of the following is NOT a technological cause of contemporary globalisation?
L2 Understand
  • (A) The microchip and microprocessors
  • (B) Jet aviation and satellites
  • (C) Internet and fibre-optic cables
  • (D) The horse-drawn carriage
Answer: (D) — Microchips, jet aviation, satellites, internet and fibre-optic cables are all key technological enablers of contemporary globalisation. The horse-drawn carriage belongs to a much earlier era and is not a cause of contemporary globalisation.
Q3. Analyse, in five sentences, why the political consequences of globalisation cannot simply be described as "the state is dying".
L4 Analyse
Model Answer: Globalisation does erode the welfare functions of the state — economic policy is increasingly shaped by markets and MNCs rather than governments. However, the state continues to discharge essential functions of law, order and national security, and old rivalries between states have not disappeared. In some respects state capacity has actually increased, because new technologies — biometric IDs, surveillance, big-data tax systems — give modern states unprecedented information about their citizens. Thus, the state is not withering away; it is being re-shaped, withdrawing from welfare while simultaneously expanding its security and information functions. The conclusion is that globalisation has political consequences that pull the state in different directions, and any blanket claim that "the state is dying" misses this complex reality.
HOT Q. The NCERT chapter explicitly warns against equating globalisation with westernisation. In a 200-word note, evaluate this claim with reference to (a) Indian software exports, (b) K-pop music's global rise, (c) the spread of yoga and Ayurveda across the world, and (d) Hollywood remakes of Bollywood films.
L6 Create
Model Answer: Equating globalisation with westernisation is empirically wrong, even if the West remains powerful. (a) India's $200+ billion IT-services export industry — Infosys, TCS, Wipro working for Western clients — is globalisation, but the value, talent and direction of innovation flow from India outward, not the reverse. (b) K-pop bands like BTS now top US Billboard charts, K-dramas dominate Netflix and Korean cinema (e.g., Parasite) wins Oscars — a flow from East Asia outward, not from the West. (c) Yoga and Ayurveda, originating in India, now have hundreds of millions of practitioners across Europe, North America and Latin America — Indian culture flowing globally. (d) While many Hindi films borrow Hollywood plots, the reverse also happens — Hollywood adapts Indian films, Korean films and Latin American novels. Globalisation is a multi-directional flow of ideas, capital, commodities and people. Westernisation is one current within it — sometimes the strongest — but the flows of culture, talent and capital from Asia, Africa and Latin America are now significant enough that calling globalisation merely "westernisation" misses how the process actually works. Globalisation is plural; westernisation is one (loud) chapter inside it.
⚖️ Assertion–Reason Questions — Part 1
Options:
(A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
(B) Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.
(C) A is true, but R is false.
(D) A is false, but R is true.
Assertion (A): Globalisation is a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving flows of ideas, capital, commodities and people across borders.
Reason (R): Globalisation is the same thing as westernisation or Americanisation.
Answer: (C) — A is true: NCERT explicitly defines globalisation as a multi-dimensional concept dealing with flows of ideas, capital, commodities and people. R is false: NCERT explicitly warns that globalisation is not the same as westernisation. Cultural flows go in many directions — yoga from India, K-pop from Korea, telenovelas from Latin America — not only from West to non-West.
Assertion (A): Technology is a critical cause of contemporary globalisation.
Reason (R): The microchip, the internet, satellites and jet aviation have revolutionised the speed and scale of communication, finance and travel between different parts of the world.
Answer: (A) — Both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A. NCERT calls technology a "critical element" of contemporary globalisation. Without microchips, satellites, the internet and jet aviation, the contemporary scale and speed of flows would not exist.
Assertion (A): Globalisation has weakened the modern state in every respect, leading to its eventual disappearance.
Reason (R): The welfare functions of the state have shrunk under pressure from markets and multinational corporations.
Answer: (D) — A is false: NCERT explicitly argues that the state is not disappearing — its essential functions of law, order and national security continue, and in some ways (surveillance, information collection) state capacity has actually increased. R is true: welfare-state functions have indeed shrunk under globalisation, with the market becoming the prime determinant of social and economic priorities.
AI Tutor
Class 12 Political Science — Contemporary World Politics
Ready
Hi! 👋 I'm Gaura, your AI Tutor for Globalisation — Concept, Causes & Political Consequences. Take your time studying the lesson — whenever you have a doubt, just ask me! I'm here to help.