This MCQ module is based on: Periodic Trends Physical
Periodic Trends Physical
This assessment will be based on: Periodic Trends Physical
Upload images, PDFs, or Word documents to include their content in assessment generation.
Periodic Trends in Physical Properties
3.7 Periodic Trends in Physical Properties
There are many observable patterns in the physical and chemical properties of elements as we descend in a group or move across a period in the Periodic Table. For example, within a period, chemical reactivity tends to be high in Group 1 metals, lowers towards the middle of the table, and increases to a maximum in the Group 17 non-metals. Likewise, within a group of representative metals (say alkali metals, Group 1), chemical reactivity increases on going down the group, whereas within a group of non-metals (say halogens), chemical reactivity decreases down the group. But why do these trends exist? And how can we explain them in terms of these properties?
3.7.1 Atomic Radius
You can well imagine that finding the size of an atom is a lot more complicated than measuring the radius of a ball. Do you know why? Firstly, because the size of an atom (~1.2 Å, i.e., 1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰ m) is incredibly small to be measured directly. Secondly, since the electron cloud surrounding the atom does not have a sharp boundary, the determination of the atomic size cannot be precise. In other words, there is no way in which we can isolate an atom and measure its diameter as we do for a ball.
One practical approach to estimate the size of an atom of a non-metallic element is to measure the distance between two atoms when they are bound together by a single bond in a covalent molecule and from this value, the "covalent radius" of the element can be calculated.
- Covalent radius: Half the internuclear distance between two atoms in a single covalent bond.
- Metallic radius: Half the internuclear distance between two adjacent atoms in a metallic crystal.
- Van der Waals radius: Half the distance between two non-bonded atoms in close contact (in solid state).
Periodic Trends in Atomic Radius
| Element (Period 2) | Atomic radius (pm) |
|---|---|
| Li | 152 |
| Be | 111 |
| B | 88 |
| C | 77 |
| N | 74 |
| O | 66 |
| F | 64 |
| Element (Group 1) | Atomic radius (pm) |
|---|---|
| Li | 152 |
| Na | 186 |
| K | 231 |
| Rb | 244 |
| Cs | 262 |
- → Across a period (left to right): atomic radius DECREASES.
Reason: Nuclear charge (Z) increases by 1 per element, but electrons add to the same shell. Higher nuclear charge pulls the same shell of electrons closer, shrinking the atom. - ↓ Down a group: atomic radius INCREASES.
Reason: A new shell is added at each step. Even though Z increases, the increasing distance and shielding of inner electrons offsets the nuclear pull.
3.7.2 Ionic Radius
The removal of an electron from an atom results in the formation of a cation, whereas gain of an electron leads to an anion. The ionic radii can be estimated by measuring the distances between cations and anions in ionic crystals.
- Cation is always SMALLER than the parent atom (one electron lost; effective nuclear charge over fewer electrons increases). E.g., Na (186 pm) → Na⁺ (95 pm).
- Anion is always LARGER than the parent atom (one electron gained; same Z over more electrons; greater electron-electron repulsion). E.g., Cl (99 pm) → Cl⁻ (181 pm).
Isoelectronic Species
Atoms and ions which contain the same number of electrons are called isoelectronic species. For example, O²⁻, F⁻, Na⁺ and Mg²⁺ all have 10 electrons. Their radii decrease with increasing nuclear charge (Z):
| Species | Z (protons) | Electrons | Ionic radius (pm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| O²⁻ | 8 | 10 | 140 |
| F⁻ | 9 | 10 | 136 |
| Na⁺ | 11 | 10 | 95 |
| Mg²⁺ | 12 | 10 | 65 |
| Al³⁺ | 13 | 10 | 50 |
3.7.3 Ionisation Enthalpy
A quantitative measure of the tendency of an element to lose electron is given by its ionisation enthalpy. It represents the energy required to remove an electron from an isolated gaseous atom (X) in its ground state:
Successive ionisations always require more energy:
Periodic Trends in Ionisation Enthalpy
| Element (Period 2) | ΔᵢH₁ (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|
| Li | 520 |
| Be | 899 |
| B | 801 |
| C | 1086 |
| N | 1402 |
| O | 1314 |
| F | 1681 |
| Ne | 2081 |
- → Across a period: INCREASES (smaller atom + higher Z = electrons more tightly held).
- ↓ Down a group: DECREASES (larger atom + more shielding = electrons easier to remove).
- B (801) < Be (899): removing one 2p electron is easier than removing a 2s electron (s-orbital is more penetrating, more strongly bound).
- O (1314) < N (1402): half-filled 2p³ in N is unusually stable; removing electron from O's 2p⁴ requires breaking pair-up.
🎯 Interactive: Periodic Trend Visualizer
Pick a property and see its trend across Period 2 and down Group 1.
Insight: Atomic radius DECREASES across period; ionisation enthalpy and electronegativity INCREASE.
3.7.4 Electron Gain Enthalpy
When an electron is added to a neutral gaseous atom (X) to convert it into a negative ion, the enthalpy change accompanying the process is defined as the electron gain enthalpy:
| Element | ΔₑgH (kJ/mol) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| F | −328 | Highly negative (small atom but compactness reduces ΔₑgH) |
| Cl | −349 | MOST NEGATIVE (anomaly — F's compactness limits its ΔₑgH) |
| Br | −325 | Less negative than Cl |
| I | −295 | Even less negative (large atom) |
| N | +0 (slightly positive) | Half-filled 2p³ is stable; resists adding e⁻ |
| Noble gases (Ne, Ar...) | +ve | Already filled; would need to enter higher shell |
3.7.5 Electronegativity
Electronegativity is the relative tendency of an atom in a molecule to attract the shared pair of electrons towards itself. Unlike ionisation enthalpy and electron gain enthalpy, it is not a measurable physical property — it is a relative scale.
Pauling Electronegativity Values
| Element | EN (Pauling) |
|---|---|
| F (highest) | 4.0 |
| O | 3.5 |
| N, Cl | 3.0 |
| C, S, Br | 2.5 |
| H, P, I | 2.1 |
| Na | 0.9 |
| K, Cs (lowest stable) | 0.7 |
- → Across period: INCREASES (smaller atom holds bonding electrons more tightly).
- ↓ Down group: DECREASES (larger atom, lower attraction).
- Most electronegative: Fluorine (4.0). Least: Cs (0.7).
- Difference between two atoms' EN predicts ionic vs covalent bond character: ΔEN > 1.7 → predominantly ionic; ΔEN < 1.7 → covalent.
Worked Examples
Worked Example 1 (NCERT Problem 3.4): Smallest in a Period
Which of the following species will have the largest and the smallest size? Mg, Mg²⁺, Al, Al³⁺.
Al: [Ne] 3s²3p¹ (atom, period 3, ~143 pm).
Mg²⁺: [Ne] (10 electrons over 12 protons; ionic radius ~65 pm).
Al³⁺: [Ne] (10 electrons over 13 protons; ionic radius ~50 pm).
Largest: Mg (atom, lowest effective nuclear charge per electron).
Smallest: Al³⁺ (10 electrons pulled by 13 protons).
Worked Example 2 (NCERT Problem 3.5): Comparing IE
Which of the following pairs of elements would have a more negative electron gain enthalpy? (i) O or F, (ii) F or Cl.
F has more negative ΔₑgH (because adding e⁻ completes 2p⁵ → 2p⁶, fully filled, very stable).
F = -328 kJ/mol; O = -141 kJ/mol.
(ii) F vs Cl: Surprisingly, Cl has more negative ΔₑgH!
F = -328 kJ/mol; Cl = -349 kJ/mol.
Reason: F's small 2p shell has high inter-electronic repulsion when adding e⁻; Cl's larger 3p shell accommodates the new electron with less repulsion → more energy released.
Worked Example 3: Electronegativity Comparison
Arrange the following elements in increasing order of electronegativity: F, P, S, Si, Cl.
Order: Si < P < S < Cl < F.
Reasoning: Period 3 elements (Si, P, S, Cl) — EN increases left-to-right. F (period 2, group 17) is even more electronegative because it's smaller and has higher effective nuclear charge per shell.
Setup: Without consulting any reference, predict the answers to these questions using only your knowledge of periodic trends:
- Which has larger atomic radius: Na or Mg?
- Which has higher first ionisation enthalpy: K or Cs?
- Which is more electronegative: O or S?
- Why does N have higher IE than O?
- Predict whether Cl⁻ or Cl is larger.
1. Na > Mg. Across period 3, Z increases but same shell. Higher Z pulls electrons closer.
2. K > Cs. Down group 1, atom gets larger, easier to remove electron. K is smaller, holds electron more tightly.
3. O > S. Down group 16, electronegativity decreases. O (3.5) > S (2.5).
4. Half-filled stability of 2p³ in N. N has stable 2p³ (Hund's max multiplicity). Adding/removing destabilizes more than O's 2p⁴.
5. Cl⁻ > Cl. Anion is always larger than its parent atom. Adding electron increases electron-electron repulsion.
🎯 Competency-Based Questions
Q1. Among the following, which species has the largest size? Mg²⁺, Na, F⁻, O²⁻, Al³⁺. L3 Apply
Q2. Why is the second ionisation enthalpy of Na very high while the first is moderate? L4 Analyse
Q3. Why does O have lower first ionisation enthalpy than N, even though O has a higher atomic number? L5 Evaluate
O has [He] 2s² 2p⁴ — the additional 2p electron pairs up with another, causing electron-electron repulsion. This makes the paired electron easier to remove. So N (1402) > O (1314) kJ/mol, despite Z(O) > Z(N).
Q4. Critically evaluate: "Cl has more negative electron gain enthalpy than F because Cl is more electronegative." L5 Evaluate
The reason Cl's ΔₑgH is more negative is the SMALL SIZE of F: when F gains an electron, the new electron enters its compact 2p subshell where there is high inter-electronic repulsion, partially offsetting the energy released. Cl's 3p subshell is more spacious, less repulsion → more energy released.
Q5. HOT (Create): A new "transition metal" of period 8 (Z = 124) is hypothesized. Predict its atomic radius, first ionisation enthalpy (compare with Au), and electronegativity. L6 Create
Atomic radius: Period 8 means a new shell (n=8). Compared to Au (period 6, ~144 pm covalent), Z=124 should have larger atomic radius (~ 200+ pm) due to extra shell, despite higher Z (relativistic effects matter for super-heavy elements!).
Ionisation enthalpy: With more shielding from filled inner shells, IE should be LOWER than Au (890 kJ/mol). Predicted: ~ 700-800 kJ/mol. (Caveat: relativistic contraction of s-orbitals can sharply increase IE for some super-heavy elements like 112-118.)
Electronegativity: Lower than Au (2.5). Predicted: ~ 1.7-2.0.
Caveats: Relativistic effects in super-heavy elements can drastically alter trends! Element 124's actual properties cannot be reliably predicted by simple periodic trends alone — quantum-mechanical calculations are required.
🧠 Assertion–Reason Questions
Choose: (A) Both true, R explains A. (B) Both true, R doesn't explain A. (C) A true, R false. (D) A false, R true.
A: Atomic radius of Na (186 pm) is greater than Mg (160 pm).
R: Across a period, atomic radius decreases due to increased nuclear charge with the same shell.
A: Ionisation enthalpy of N (1402) is higher than O (1314).
R: N has electronic configuration 2p³ (half-filled, extra stable).
A: All cations are smaller than their parent atoms.
R: Removing electrons reduces electron-electron repulsion and increases effective nuclear charge per remaining electron.